2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2020.101116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term motor outcomes of very preterm and/or very low birth weight individuals without cerebral palsy: A review of the current evidence

Abstract: We reviewed literature on long-term motor outcomes of individuals aged five years or older born very preterm (VP: ≤32 weeks of gestation) or with very low birth weight (VLBW: ≤1500g), without cerebral palsy (CP). PubMed produced 2827 articles, whereof 38 were eligible. Assessed by standardised and norm-based motor tests, the Movement Assessment Battery for Children being the most widely used, VP/VLBW individuals showed poorer motor skills compared with term-born controls with differences of approximately 1 SD … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
52
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
8
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very preterm children tend to have more physical and motor limitations [15,16] and show reduced pulmonary function, aerobic capacity, and muscle strength [17]. Despite this, no difference in physical activity levels has been reported during adolescence between very preterm and term born children [18][19][20], although lower levels of physical activity have been observed in young adults [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very preterm children tend to have more physical and motor limitations [15,16] and show reduced pulmonary function, aerobic capacity, and muscle strength [17]. Despite this, no difference in physical activity levels has been reported during adolescence between very preterm and term born children [18][19][20], although lower levels of physical activity have been observed in young adults [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Income and geographical region were identified as relevant factors of prevalence variability regarding psychomotor and cognitive outcomes of preterm infants [ 29 ], as well as parental education, parenting style, parental mental health, family structure, family functioning, and the home environment [ 19 , 30 ]. Moreover, it is known that results in motor [ 31 ] and mental development [ 32 ] show a wide variability across studies and countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meta-analysis of Kerr-Wilson et al (2012) documents that 4 out of 27 included studies report no differences in cognitive development between preterm and full-term infants. Evidence regarding the psychomotor development is less ambiguous, as preterm infants persistently get significantly lower scores in these tasks than full-term infants (Evensen et al, 2020;Oudgenoeg-Paz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%