2010
DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Metformin Use Is Associated With Decreased Risk of Breast Cancer

Abstract: OBJECTIVETo evaluate whether use of oral hypoglycemic agents is associated with an altered breast cancer risk in women.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSUsing the U.K.-based General Practice Research Database, we conducted a nested case-control analysis among 22,621 female users of oral antidiabetes drugs with type 2 diabetes. We evaluated whether they had an altered risk of breast cancer in relation to use of various types of oral hypoglycemic agents. Case and control patients with a recorded diagnosis of type 2 dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
376
3
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(402 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
376
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…When analysis was done separately by cancer incidence and cancer mortality, we found similar SRRs with a decrease in heterogeneity for mortality and no statistically significant difference (P = 0.90) between the two estimates. When the six studies on incidence of single cancer sites, that is, colon (40), pancreatic (38), HCC (34,45), breast (46), and prostate (39) cancers, were included, similar summary risk estimates were obtained (SRR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.70). A trend toward a large risk reduction was noted for colon and pancreatic cancer (60-80% risk reduction) in two independent studies for each cancer site, even when only those cancers diagnosed >2 years after diabetes developed were included (to minimize effects of reverse causation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When analysis was done separately by cancer incidence and cancer mortality, we found similar SRRs with a decrease in heterogeneity for mortality and no statistically significant difference (P = 0.90) between the two estimates. When the six studies on incidence of single cancer sites, that is, colon (40), pancreatic (38), HCC (34,45), breast (46), and prostate (39) cancers, were included, similar summary risk estimates were obtained (SRR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.70). A trend toward a large risk reduction was noted for colon and pancreatic cancer (60-80% risk reduction) in two independent studies for each cancer site, even when only those cancers diagnosed >2 years after diabetes developed were included (to minimize effects of reverse causation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Eight of these articles were not included in the meta-analysis for the following reasons: (a) two referred to the same study cohort: Evans et al (35) presented a subset of patients included in a study published later (36), and Jecht (37) published in a German language journal the results already presented in English by Libby et al (36); (b) six did not report overall cancer incidence but data on a single organ site, that is, pancreatic cancer (38), hepatocellular cancer (HCC; refs. 34,45), breast (46), prostate (39), and colorectal cancer (40). These studies were analyzed separately for descriptive purposes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of recent interest is the potential repurposing of metformin, an oral insulinsensitizer used as first-line treatment for Type 2 diabetes (DM2). Specifically, there is now interest in validating the several meta-analyses indicating the usefulness of metformin in cancer therapy and/or prevention [1][2][3]. Indeed, cytotoxic effects of metformin in many cancer cell lines has been demonstrated [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is motivated in part by hypothesis-generating epidemiological studies, which suggest that diabetic patients receiving metformin have substantially (B40%) reduced cancer burden compared with diabetic patients receiving other therapies (Evans et al, 2005;Currie et al, 2009;Libby et al, 2009;Bodmer et al, 2010;Landman et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%