2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.01.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term maintenance of sustained virological response in liver transplant recipients treated for recurrent hepatitis C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baseline characteristics and outcomes of FCH and non-FCH patients are presented in Among 52 cirrhotics, the SVR12 rate was 66%. Also in this subgroup all relapsers were successfully re-treated and experienced an improvement of baseline vs long-term observation MELD (13 [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] vs 9 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], P<.0001) and CTP score (9 [7-10] vs 5 [5,6], P<.0001).…”
Section: Outcomes In Patients With Fch and In Cirrhoticsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Baseline characteristics and outcomes of FCH and non-FCH patients are presented in Among 52 cirrhotics, the SVR12 rate was 66%. Also in this subgroup all relapsers were successfully re-treated and experienced an improvement of baseline vs long-term observation MELD (13 [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] vs 9 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], P<.0001) and CTP score (9 [7-10] vs 5 [5,6], P<.0001).…”
Section: Outcomes In Patients With Fch and In Cirrhoticsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…All liver function tests improved significantly during and after therapy. The MELD score was improved from baseline to last follow-up (15 [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] vs 10 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], P<.0001, Fig. S1A).…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the evaluation of AT response is often based more on virology than on histology, it has been reported that IFN may play an antifibrotic effect even in those patients in whom an antiviral effect is not observed [95]. Moreover, AT seems to slow down disease progression in SVR [96] and increases patient survival in treated LT recipients [97][98][99]. Table 2 summarizes data on post-treatment fibrosis modification [96,[100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114].…”
Section: Fibrosis Progression After Liver Transplantation: Is Better mentioning
confidence: 99%