2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term integrity of shaly seals in CO2 geo-sequestration sites: An experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also the case that depleted gas reservoirs have larger pore volumes available for storage compared to, for instance, saline aquifers of the same size whose porosity is completely filled with water. Although having retained hydrocarbons over geological-time is not a guarantee that CO 2 will not leak because: 1) in the near vicinity of wells the sealing capacity of the cap rock may have been damaged by the penetration of wells (Metcalfe et al, 2017); 2) CO 2 /CH 4 / brine interfacial tension is much lower than hydrocarbon-water systems (Li et al, 2006), 3) CO 2 may have a different wettability to hydrocarbons being less water-wet; 4) reactions at the shale interface may compromise seal integrity (e.g., Gholami et al, 2021) and 5) the reduced horizontal stresses within the depleted reservoirs add difficulty in drilling and cementing increasing the risk of well leakage that may also lead to large mud losses and difficulties in cemented casing (e.g., Shahbazi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Carbon Capture and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also the case that depleted gas reservoirs have larger pore volumes available for storage compared to, for instance, saline aquifers of the same size whose porosity is completely filled with water. Although having retained hydrocarbons over geological-time is not a guarantee that CO 2 will not leak because: 1) in the near vicinity of wells the sealing capacity of the cap rock may have been damaged by the penetration of wells (Metcalfe et al, 2017); 2) CO 2 /CH 4 / brine interfacial tension is much lower than hydrocarbon-water systems (Li et al, 2006), 3) CO 2 may have a different wettability to hydrocarbons being less water-wet; 4) reactions at the shale interface may compromise seal integrity (e.g., Gholami et al, 2021) and 5) the reduced horizontal stresses within the depleted reservoirs add difficulty in drilling and cementing increasing the risk of well leakage that may also lead to large mud losses and difficulties in cemented casing (e.g., Shahbazi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Carbon Capture and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of geological carbon dioxide storage (GCS) has gained widespread acceptance as an effective strategy for controlling carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. 1 Although field applications have established the technical viability of GCS, safety and commercial considerations restrict the continued development of GCS operations. The time frame for which CO 2 is anticipated to be trapped within geological structures is projected to extend over thousands of years.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have evaluated the role of geochemical alterations induced by scCO2brine interactions in the capillary properties of the storage zone [89][90][91] and confining zone [60,69,73,[92][93][94][95][96][97][98]. Due to their high reactivity, limestones are generally the storage rock of focus, given that the reactivity of sandstones (mainly quartz) is extremely slow and pH-independent [16,83].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A secondary alteration of feldspars can occur when the concentration of calcium ions deriving from the dissolution of carbonates plus originally occurring in the brine is considerable [80,88]. An example is the dissolution of albite consuming Ca 2+ and leading to the precipitation of calcite and kaolinite [80]: Recent studies have evaluated the role of geochemical alterations induced by scCO 2 -brine interactions in the capillary properties of the storage zone [89][90][91] and confining zone [60,69,73,[92][93][94][95][96][97][98]. Due to their high reactivity, limestones are generally the storage rock of focus, given that the reactivity of sandstones (mainly quartz) is extremely slow and pH-independent [16,83].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%