2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term impact of network access to bike facilities and public transit stations on housing sales prices in Portland, Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Liu and Shi [27] underlined that the density of the bike network in Portland (Oregon) was a positive contributor to property values. Welch et al [21], however, found more mixed results in the same city. In Montreal (Canada), El-Geneidy et al [28] highlighted that the presence of a bicycle-sharing system in a neighborhood with 12 stations serving an 800-m buffer was expected to increase property values by approximately 2.7%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Liu and Shi [27] underlined that the density of the bike network in Portland (Oregon) was a positive contributor to property values. Welch et al [21], however, found more mixed results in the same city. In Montreal (Canada), El-Geneidy et al [28] highlighted that the presence of a bicycle-sharing system in a neighborhood with 12 stations serving an 800-m buffer was expected to increase property values by approximately 2.7%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the United States, Bowes and Ihlanfeldt [16] found both positive and negative effects of rail stations on the local house prices in Atlanta. Several other studies conducted in the USA showed a positive relationship between property values and the distance from light rail (LRT) stations, such as in Santa Clara (California) [17,18], Charlotte (North Carolina) [6], Buffalo (New York) [19], Dallas (Texas) [20], Portland (Oregon) [21] and Phoenix (Arizona) [22]. In Brisbane (Australia), Mulley et al [23] found that being close to a bus rapid transit (BRT) added a premium to the housing price of 0.14% for every hundred meters closer to the BRT station.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Swoboda et al, 2015) worked with price variations due to traffic noise. (Welch et al, 2016) investigated the influence of the access to bike lanes and the proximity of public transport. Other works studied the effects of accessibility and location, with elements regarding the distance from highways (Allen et al, 2015), the accessibility in general (Li et al, 2016) and easy access and safety for people who walk in the neighborhood (Li et al, 2015).…”
Section: General Small and Mid-size Cities Have Still Not Adopted Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the presumption is that parks and trails have a positive effect on housing prices [9], but the relevant literature also shows that these amenities can have either no effect or even a negative impact on property values [16,33,34]. These differences in outcomes depend widely on the heterogeneity that can be found in the types of facilities and the neighborhood characteristics [17,[35][36][37].…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, networked bike trails have greater effects than non-networked trails. Welch et al [37] estimated the joint impact of network proximity to rail transit stations and on-street bike lanes and off-street multiuse paths. They confirmed Krizek's [33] finding that off-street facilities tend to appreciate property prices, while on-street bike lanes have the opposite effect.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%