2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term impact of fertilization on activity and composition of bacterial communities and metabolic guilds in agricultural soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
99
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
99
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significant differences tests of soil properties, microbial process rates (Enwall et al, 2005(Enwall et al, , 2007, crop yield and the data from qPCR analysis of the communities were performed using the MASS package (Ihaka and Gentleman, 1996) in the R statistical programming environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Analysis of variance and Tukey's honest significant differences tests of soil properties, microbial process rates (Enwall et al, 2005(Enwall et al, , 2007, crop yield and the data from qPCR analysis of the communities were performed using the MASS package (Ihaka and Gentleman, 1996) in the R statistical programming environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the years 1956-1999, springsown cereals dominated in the crop rotation and fodder rape and fodder beet were occasionally cultivated (Kirchmann et al, 1994), but since 2000, all plots except the bare fallows have been cropped with maize (Zea mays). To obtain a good estimate of the primary production in the different treatments, the average crop yield during 2000-2006 for each (Enwall et al, 2005(Enwall et al, , 2007. Total soil nitrogen was measured as Kjeldahl nitrogen (ISO 10694), total content of organic carbon was determined through dry combustion (ISO 13878) and the pH was measured in slurry of 0.01 M calcium chloride (ISO 10390) at the time of sampling (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations