2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1027-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term health-related quality of life of living kidney donors: a single-center experience

Abstract: Living donor kidney transplantation appears to be safe for donors. The HRQoL is excellent. To ensure a positive outcome for donors, a good clinical evaluation of potential donors is essential.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At our center, we analyzed 147 living kidney donors who had undergone donor nephrectomy. The response rate of 23.3% was quite fair, however, it is slightly lower than in other studies [ [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] ]. The study was conducted during a pandemic, which is likely to contribute lower response rate because of lockdown and travel restrictions that might made it difficult for many donors to participate.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…At our center, we analyzed 147 living kidney donors who had undergone donor nephrectomy. The response rate of 23.3% was quite fair, however, it is slightly lower than in other studies [ [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] ]. The study was conducted during a pandemic, which is likely to contribute lower response rate because of lockdown and travel restrictions that might made it difficult for many donors to participate.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…These findings are consistent with those of previous studies on living kidney donors. [ 28 , 29 ] This finding shows that living kidney donors recover their physical function and mental health after donation and maintain a HRQoL which is comparable to the general population. [ 1 , 7 ] General health and vitality had the lowest scores, similar to the results of studies in the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The studies encompassed a diverse range of countries, with research conducted in the United States [ 2 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], Germany [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], the Netherlands [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], India [ 1 , 28 , 29 ], Sweden [ 30 , 31 ], Brazil [ 32 ], China [ 33 ], Iran [ 34 ], Korea [ 35 ], Malaysia [ 36 ], Spain [ 37 ], Taiwan [ 38 ], Turkey [ 39 , 40 ], and the UK [ 41 ], and studies conducted across Canada and Australia [ 15 , 16 ]. Notably, most of the studies originated from Western countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 28 studies, 13 included related donors (e.g., parents, siblings, partners, or friends) only [ 1 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 28 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], 12 studies included both related and unspecified donors [ 2 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 41 ], while 3 papers did not report the donor–recipient relationship [ 24 , 25 , 32 ]. The mean age of the donors ranged from 36.45 (SD = 16.9) to 58 (SD = 11) years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%