2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-021-00991-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term hard and soft tissue response following isolated genioplasty: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the vertical axis, the ratios were approximately 1. However, a systematic review studying the hard and soft tissue response following isolated genioplasty reported that the ratio of soft and hard tissue changes after genioplasty ranged from 0.09 to 0.7 among the studies in the vertical plane 32 . Furthermore, Sylvain Chamberland revealed that chin soft-tissue changes could be predicted horizontally more precisely than vertically 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vertical axis, the ratios were approximately 1. However, a systematic review studying the hard and soft tissue response following isolated genioplasty reported that the ratio of soft and hard tissue changes after genioplasty ranged from 0.09 to 0.7 among the studies in the vertical plane 32 . Furthermore, Sylvain Chamberland revealed that chin soft-tissue changes could be predicted horizontally more precisely than vertically 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In severe hypoplasia of the chin, which requires advancement > 10 mm, the labiomental fold may be deepened, in which case, an auxiliary implant may be considered. 16 In 2014, Seifeldin et al 8 reported chin genioplasty using a shield shape. Technically, performing an osteotomy in the shape of a shield using a reciprocating or oscillating saw is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In severe hypoplasia of the chin, which requires advancement >10 mm, the labiomental fold may be deepened, in which case, an auxiliary implant may be considered 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%