2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term GRMHD simulations of neutron star merger accretion discs: implications for electromagnetic counterparts

Abstract: We investigate the long-term evolution of black hole accretion disks formed in neutron star mergers. These disks expel matter that contributes to an r-process kilonova, and can produce relativistic jets powering short gamma-ray bursts. Here we report the results of a threedimensional, general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulation of such a disk which is evolved for long enough (∼ 9 s, or ∼ 6 × 10 5 r g /c) to achieve completion of mass ejection far from the disk. Our model starts with a poloidal … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
360
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(397 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
29
360
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The best fitting model is one represented by a dynamic ejecta mass of ∼ 0.001 M and a secular ejecta mass ∼ 0.01 M . The secular ejecta mass, required for the early blue excess, is consistent with the expectation of the mass-loss from a torus surrounding a massive neutron star (Fujibayashi et al 2018;Fernández et al 2019). However, the best-fit model from our parameter sample under-predicts the observed g-band emission at ∼ 2 and ∼ 4 days post-burst, this is likely due to the finite parameter spacing of the kilonova model samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The best fitting model is one represented by a dynamic ejecta mass of ∼ 0.001 M and a secular ejecta mass ∼ 0.01 M . The secular ejecta mass, required for the early blue excess, is consistent with the expectation of the mass-loss from a torus surrounding a massive neutron star (Fujibayashi et al 2018;Fernández et al 2019). However, the best-fit model from our parameter sample under-predicts the observed g-band emission at ∼ 2 and ∼ 4 days post-burst, this is likely due to the finite parameter spacing of the kilonova model samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…While alternative interpretations have been proposed, they are either disfavored by current simulations and observations (e.g. jets) [40,42], or require the presence of large-scale strong magnetic fields which might not be formed in the postmerger [35,43,44,75]. We identified a robust dynamical mechanism for mass ejection that might explain observations without requiring any fine-tuning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…other forms of ejecta that become more important over longer evolution time scales. After merger, magneticallydriven [82,91] and neutrino-driven [92] winds as well as outflows due to viscous angular momentum transport and α-particle recombination [93] should combine to unbind a large fraction of the remnant disk (∼ 40% for disks around black holes in [82]). Based on these results for the long-term evolution of post-merger disk, we can provide order-of-magnitude estimates of the evolution of the remnant produced at the end of our simulations.…”
Section: Long-term Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%