2002
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-34478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Functional Results of Transhiatal Oesophagectomy and Colonic Interposition for Caustic Oesophageal Stricture

Abstract: Aim of the study. Various surgical procedures have been advocated for replacement of the scarred oesophagus in children. We report here on our experience of oesophago-coloplasty. Methods. Over a 10-year period, 100 children (62 boys, 38 girls) with intractable caustic stricture of the oesophagus underwent transhiatal oesophagectomy and left colonic interposition. Their age at the time of reconstruction ranged from 14 months to 8 years (mean 3.4 years). Results. The patients were followed up post reconstruction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The timing of surgery is controversial. While reported best 6 months after initial injury [14], interval of 2-3 months was reported to be adequate by Munoz-Bongrand et al [15]. In our study, the mean timing of intervention was 4 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The timing of surgery is controversial. While reported best 6 months after initial injury [14], interval of 2-3 months was reported to be adequate by Munoz-Bongrand et al [15]. In our study, the mean timing of intervention was 4 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The diaphragmatic crus was opened and transhiatal dissection of the oesophagus was continued under direct vision and very close to the esophageal wall by harmonic scalpel (Figs. [2][3][4]. A tunnel was created in the posterior mediastinum up to the middle of the thorax.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various segments of the gastrointestinal tract have been used to replace the scarred esophagus; colon and stomach were the best oesophageal substitutes [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scar retraction began as early as the end of the second week, and lasted for about six months. It took about 6-12 months before full fibrosis stopped to develop after the injury which showed that the edge of the stricture in the esophagus might not be confirmed until then [14,15] . A too earlier operation, when the scar has not completely formed, may promote the risk of anastomotic leak and stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes were pulmonary emboli, myocardial infarcts and severe infectious complication with multi-organ failure. Nevertheless, the morbidity rate is still high and it ranges from 20% to 60% in the literature [12,14,16,17] . The morbidity in our series was 26.6 % (n=28).…”
Section: Choice Of Replacement Organsmentioning
confidence: 99%