2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term forecast of energy commodities price using machine learning

Abstract: We compare the long-horizon forecast performance of traditional econometric models with machine learning methods (Neural Networks and Random Forests) for the main energy commodities in the world using monthly prices provided by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). We study the case of Oil (Brent, WTI and Dubai Fateh), Coal (AU) and Gas (US and Russia). Models accuracy are measured using RMSE and MAPE and the M-DM test is applied to evaluate whether there is a statistically significant difference between the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lohrmann and Luukka (2019) interpreted the classification of the S&P500 open-to-close returns as a four-class problem and compared four trading strategies based on a random forest classifier to a buyand-hold strategy. Herrera et al (2019) compared the long horizon forecast performance of traditional econometric models with machine learning methods (Neural Networks and Random Forests), for the main energy commodities in the world, using monthly prices provided by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Ciner (2019) showed that when the random forest method, which accounts for both linear and nonlinear dynamics, was used for regression, then industry returns indeed contain significant out of sample forecasting power for the market index return.…”
Section: Random Forest Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lohrmann and Luukka (2019) interpreted the classification of the S&P500 open-to-close returns as a four-class problem and compared four trading strategies based on a random forest classifier to a buyand-hold strategy. Herrera et al (2019) compared the long horizon forecast performance of traditional econometric models with machine learning methods (Neural Networks and Random Forests), for the main energy commodities in the world, using monthly prices provided by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Ciner (2019) showed that when the random forest method, which accounts for both linear and nonlinear dynamics, was used for regression, then industry returns indeed contain significant out of sample forecasting power for the market index return.…”
Section: Random Forest Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed and evaluated four different methods, a hybridization of traditional econometric models, artificial neural networks, random forests, and the no-change method, as described in [1]. The last one implies that changes in an observation value are unpredictable, so the best forecast is simply the current observation value.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The multi-boundary score is used for predicting solar energy generation 13 and solar irradiance prediction using deep neural networks. 14 Wind speed forecasting wavelet transform and support vector machines, 15 Artificial neural networks (ANN), 16 SVM, 17 random forest, 18 K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Support vector regression (SVR) 19,20 models predict wind and solar power generation using weather information. Blending approaches are used to improve the regional forecast with support vector machines to forecast short-term solar radiation system.…”
Section: Renewable Energy Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%