2017
DOI: 10.3390/ijms18050962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Follow-Up of Resistance-Associated Substitutions in Hepatitis C Virus in Patients in Which Direct Acting Antiviral-Based Therapy Failed

Abstract: We evaluated the transition of dominant resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) in hepatitis C virus during long-term follow-up after the failure of DAAs (direct acting antivirals)-based therapy. RASs in non-structure (NS)3/4A, NS5A, NS5B, and deletions in NS5A from 20 patients who failed simeprevir/pegylated-interferon/ribavirin (SMV/PEG-IFN/RBV) and 25 patients who failed daclatasvir/asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) treatment were examined by direct sequencing. With respect to SMV/PEG-IFN/RBV treatment, RAS was dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it was a single‐centre study and only involved Japanese patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection. Second, we could not detect <20.0%‐25.0% of the mutations related to amino acid substitutions because an ultradeep sequencing method was not used. However, in previous studies, NS5A RASs were generally examined by direct‐sequencing methods because the predominant RASs are associated with the outcome of DAA therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, it was a single‐centre study and only involved Japanese patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection. Second, we could not detect <20.0%‐25.0% of the mutations related to amino acid substitutions because an ultradeep sequencing method was not used. However, in previous studies, NS5A RASs were generally examined by direct‐sequencing methods because the predominant RASs are associated with the outcome of DAA therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Serum samples were obtained from the patients before treatment. Amino acids sequences in the NS5A region of HCV genotype 1 were examined as described previously . In detail, RNA was extracted from 140 μL serum using a commercial kit (QIAmp viral RNA mini kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NS3/4A protease‐resistant HCV variants have reduced fitness, as estimated by viral replicative ability and production of infectious progeny . In contrast to NS3 RAVs, treatment‐emergent NS5A RAVs do not appear to compromise fitness and are known to persist for a long time . It is possible that RBV‐induced transitions may be suppressed among treatment‐emergent NS5A RAVs due to high viral fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 In contrast to NS3 RAVs, treatmentemergent NS5A RAVs do not appear to compromise fitness and are known to persist for a long time. 29,33,34 It is possible that RBV- Induction of G-to-A hypermutation in human immunodeficiency virus and HBV has been reported as part of host innate immunity against virus infection; hypermutation of HBV was induced in hepatocytes, and expression of APOBEC3G protein in liver cellderived cell lines increased hypermutation. 35 On the other hand, there are few reports about APOBEC3G and hypermutation in HCV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeted assays had been previously developed to identify a specific RAV [27,28]. RAVs which are found at levels with at least 15% variant frequency, at baseline, are known to confer resistance to certain DAAs [29], and therefore may impact on the effectiveness of DAA treatment [30]. Vela NGS targets relevant RAVs in three non-structural gene segments (NS3, NS5A and NS5B) of HCV 1a and 1b, and although the RAV profiling is comprehensive but not exhaustive due to the assay design, any baseline RAVs present in any of these DAA target genes, can affect the therapeutic effectiveness [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%