Background and Purpose-The effectiveness of different treatments for internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection has not been well defined. Lack of early prognostic indicators may represent a major problem in adequately identifying the most appropriate option for treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the influence of patients' vascular risk profiles and of early cerebral hemodynamic changes in determining the clinical evolution after ICA dissection. Methods-Sixty-six stroke patients with ICA occlusion due to spontaneous artery dissection were included. Transcranial Doppler was performed within 24 hours from symptom onset to examine cerebral arteries and the patency of the 3 major intracranial collateral vessels (ophthalmic artery and anterior and posterior communicating arteries). Possible recanalization of the occluded ICA within the first month was evaluated. Stroke severity at onset was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, whereas outcome was defined according to the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days after stroke onset. Results-Forty patients had at least 2 activated intracranial collateral vessels. The remaining 26 patients, with none or only 1 collateral vessel, showed a significant increased risk of poor recovery (modified Rankin Scale score Ն2; adjusted relative riskϭ14.9; 95% CI, 3.24 to 68.46). Poor recovery was not associated with the occurrence of recanalization, with stroke severity at onset, or with vascular risk profile. Key Words: carotid dissection Ⅲ transcranial Doppler Ⅲ collateral circulation Ⅲ acute stroke S pontaneous dissection of the carotid artery has traditionally been considered a rare but probably underestimated cause of ischemic stroke. 1 Nowadays, a correct diagnosis of arterial dissection is more frequent, particularly in young patients with ischemic stroke, owing to the increasing availability of vascular imaging techniques in the very early phase of symptom onset. 2 Nevertheless, the best therapeutic approach to reduce ischemic damage progression and the risk of new ischemic events has not yet been defined. Some studies have compared the efficacy of surgical/endovascular versus medical treatment, 3 whereas others have investigated whether anticoagulation can obtain better results than antiplatelet agents. 4 Results have not yet shown clear advantages resulting from 1 approach compared with another and, at the moment, the "gold standard" of treatment remains unclear and options are largely empirical. 5 This lack of evidence supporting the best single, therapeutic approach could result from the overall good prognosis of patients with stroke caused by carotid dissection. 6 Furthermore, it is possible to hypothesize that stroke patients with carotid dissection are not a homogeneous group and that their clinical evolution can be influenced by different aspects, including severity of carotid lumen narrowing, vessel wall properties, and a potential for spontaneous recanalization. 7 Moreover, similar to atherosclerotic internal carotid occlusive disease cond...