2020
DOI: 10.1177/0009922820941097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Follow-up of Hypophosphatemic Bone Disease Associated With Elemental Formula Use: Sustained Correction of Bone Disease After Formula Change or Phosphate Supplementation

Abstract: In this article, we describe the long-term outcomes of children who were previously reported to have developed hypophosphatemic bone disease in association with elemental formula use. An extended chart review allowed for an updated report of 34 children with regard to severity/duration of bone disease, extent of recovery, and time to correction using radiology reports and biochemical data. After implementation of formula change and/or phosphate supplementation, we found that serum phosphorus concentration incr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, AAF has been reported to lack the capability of building up tolerance and imposes high economic burden on families and healthcare systems (5,19,20). In addition, as the average duration of formula use in this case studies was longer than 6 months, prolonged use of AAF could increase the risk of hypophosphatemia and rickets as reported earlier (20)(21)(22)(23)(24). Therefore, clinicians should limit its use for extremely severe cases and when eHF is not tolerated, which is supported by this study findings (9,25,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, AAF has been reported to lack the capability of building up tolerance and imposes high economic burden on families and healthcare systems (5,19,20). In addition, as the average duration of formula use in this case studies was longer than 6 months, prolonged use of AAF could increase the risk of hypophosphatemia and rickets as reported earlier (20)(21)(22)(23)(24). Therefore, clinicians should limit its use for extremely severe cases and when eHF is not tolerated, which is supported by this study findings (9,25,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…As tolerance development is thought to be an antigen-driven process, the use of AAF is unlikely to promote tolerance development (113) although a recent study showed that supplementing AAF with synbiotics improved the gut microbiota in non-IgE mediated allergic infants (114). The use of AAF for more than 6 months in children was recently reported to have the potential adverse effect of causing hypophosphatemic bone disease especially among those with complex GI conditions (115)(116)(117)(118)(119). These studies also reported restoration of calcium and phosphorus homeostasis following a formula change to eHF.…”
Section: Amino Acid-based Formulae (Aaf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, hypophosphatemia has been associated with parenteral nutrition with a high amino acid content, and formulas with equimolar (0.75:1 to 1:1) Ca 2+ :PO 4 ratios, along with careful monitoring of electrolytes including phosphorus have been r e c o m m e n d e d t o p r e v e n t h y p e r c a l c a e m i a a n d hypophosphatemia [33,34]. Hypophosphatemia has been described in some infants given correctly prepared formulas, and it has been suggested that bioavailability of phosphorus may be suboptimal in some infants in the context of gastrointestinal disease or tube feeding [35]. Formula change and/or phosphate supplementation improved hypophosphatemia in these infants [35].…”
Section: Nutritional Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypophosphatemia has been described in some infants given correctly prepared formulas, and it has been suggested that bioavailability of phosphorus may be suboptimal in some infants in the context of gastrointestinal disease or tube feeding [ 35 ]. Formula change and/or phosphate supplementation improved hypophosphatemia in these infants [ 35 ].…”
Section: Low Serum Pthmentioning
confidence: 99%