2014
DOI: 10.5603/kp.a2014.0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term follow-up of DDD pacing mode

Abstract: 1. Effective DDD pacing from the originally implanted system was noted in a high percentage (72%) of patients in long-term observation (15 years). 2. Progression to permanent AF is the most common reason for loss of DDD pacing;a history of paroxysmal AF and old age are the risk factors. 3. Subclavian vein puncture is associated with a higher rate of atrial lead damage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greenspon et al [26] reported that the rate of device-associated infections in the United States rose from 1.53% in 2004 to 2.41% in 2008, likely due to an increase of patients with multiple comorbidities. Earlier reports on DDD PM population with implantation between 1984 and 2002 showed the rate of device-related infection was less than or equal to 1.2% [27,28]. The present study shows that device-related infection was not a risk factor for increased mortality during follow-up and patients diagnosed with pacing system infection had relatively good long-term survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Greenspon et al [26] reported that the rate of device-associated infections in the United States rose from 1.53% in 2004 to 2.41% in 2008, likely due to an increase of patients with multiple comorbidities. Earlier reports on DDD PM population with implantation between 1984 and 2002 showed the rate of device-related infection was less than or equal to 1.2% [27,28]. The present study shows that device-related infection was not a risk factor for increased mortality during follow-up and patients diagnosed with pacing system infection had relatively good long-term survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%