Long term follow up of high risk children: who, why and how?

Abstract

BackgroundMost babies are born healthy and grow and develop normally through childhood. There are, however, clearly identifiable high-risk groups of survivors, such as those born preterm or with ill-health, who are destined to have higher than expected rates of health or developmental problems, and for whom more structured and specialised follow-up programs are warranted.DiscussionThis paper presents the results of a two-day workshop held in Melbourne, Australia, to discuss neonatal populations in need of more structured follow-up and why, in addition to how, such a follow-up programme might be structured. Issues discussed included the ages of follow-up, and the personnel and assessment tools that might be required. Challenges for translating results into both clinical practice and research were identified. Further issues covered included information sharing, best practice for families and research gaps.SummaryA substantial minority of high-risk children has long-term medical, developmental and psychological adverse outcomes and will consume extensive health and education services as they grow older. Early intervention to prevent adverse outcomes and the effective integration of services once problems are identified may reduce the prevalence and severity of certain outcomes, and will contribute to an efficient and effective use of health resources. The shared long-term goal for families and professionals is to work toward ensuring that high risk children maximise their potential and become productive and valued members of society.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2431-14-279) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Preterm Cognitive Function Into Adulthood

“…That cognitive development can be predicted from age 2 years is important information for health practitioners and validates existing efforts to monitor these children around this time to plan and provide appropriate support. 52 Yet, it is important to realize that these …”

Prospective evaluation of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd Edition in very‐low‐birthweight infants

“…1,2 Early identification of developmental delay is essential, as timely intervention has been consistently associated with improved cognitive outcomes. 1,2 Early identification of developmental delay is essential, as timely intervention has been consistently associated with improved cognitive outcomes.…”

“…1,2 Early identification of developmental delay is essential, as timely intervention has been consistently associated with improved cognitive outcomes. 1,6 However, because it is costly, lengthy, and requires trained personnel, a valid alternative tool that can effectively identify developmental delay is needed. 1,6 However, because it is costly, lengthy, and requires trained personnel, a valid alternative tool that can effectively identify developmental delay is needed.…”

Developmental cascades of social inhibition and friendships in preterm and full‐term children

“…Although health care professionals can provide regular follow‐up assessments of all children born preterm to support screening and early identification of problems in social competence (Doyle et al, ), future studies are necessary to clarify what (and for whom) interventions are indicated. Moreover, including such information in future studies may shed light on the impact of specific interventions on children's social outcomes over time.…”