2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.01.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term fading of LiF:Mg, Cu, P and LiF:Mg, Ti thermoluminescence detectors with standard and modified activator composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been observed that two month fading of the TL peak 'B' (Obryk,2010) does not differ significantly from fading of basic peaks of LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors reported by Ptaszkiewicz (2007). Our recent data, which are still under detailed evaluation, also indicate that the TL peak 'B' intensity was not altered substantially eight years after exposure, on the contrary it even seems as amplification of the TL peak 'B' occurred, and only low temperature peaks were suppressed.…”
Section: Tl Glow-curves For Different Radiation Typesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It has also been observed that two month fading of the TL peak 'B' (Obryk,2010) does not differ significantly from fading of basic peaks of LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors reported by Ptaszkiewicz (2007). Our recent data, which are still under detailed evaluation, also indicate that the TL peak 'B' intensity was not altered substantially eight years after exposure, on the contrary it even seems as amplification of the TL peak 'B' occurred, and only low temperature peaks were suppressed.…”
Section: Tl Glow-curves For Different Radiation Typesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Characterization of TLDs is required for accurate dosimetry, i.e. the sensitivity of the thermoluminescent (TL) material, the energy and dose responses, the stability and reproducibility of results, and thermal fading [114][115][116] of the detector must be evaluated for a given kind of ionizing radiation. MCP and MT dosimeters of standard thicknesses from different manufacturers have been tested along the past years to low-energy x and gamma rays [117][118][119] , conventional megavoltage (MV) photon 47;120-122 and electron 47;123-126 beams, neutrons 127;128 , alpha particles 129 , beta electrons, mixed fields 127;130-134 and high-energy particle beams (i.e.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%