2007
DOI: 10.1080/15320380601077859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Explosive Contamination in Soil: Effects on Soil Microbial Community and Bioremediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
19
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
19
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the results of Gong et al, no significant decreases in bacterial activity were detected in soils contaminated with up to 15,000 mg/kg RDX, which far exceeds the previously reported LOAEC for RDX [13]. Likewise, reduced soil quality and decreased soil bacterial biomass carbon was previously reported in RDX, TNT, and HMX contaminated field soil [1]; however, with the exception of the day 7 and 21 NE soil treatments, RDX was not correlated with decreased bacterial biomass in the present study. While the high bioavailability TX soil appeared to be slightly more sensitive to RDX contamination in terms of its overall functional diversity on day 7, this trend was not consistent over the course of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike the results of Gong et al, no significant decreases in bacterial activity were detected in soils contaminated with up to 15,000 mg/kg RDX, which far exceeds the previously reported LOAEC for RDX [13]. Likewise, reduced soil quality and decreased soil bacterial biomass carbon was previously reported in RDX, TNT, and HMX contaminated field soil [1]; however, with the exception of the day 7 and 21 NE soil treatments, RDX was not correlated with decreased bacterial biomass in the present study. While the high bioavailability TX soil appeared to be slightly more sensitive to RDX contamination in terms of its overall functional diversity on day 7, this trend was not consistent over the course of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…A milder extraction method (i.e., sequential extraction with acetonitrile and mechanical shaking) may have better described differences in RDX sorption in the two soils. The carbon-and nitrogen-rich RDX significantly increased soil NO 3 and OM levels in the most highly contaminated treatments, which has been reported in previous studies [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations