Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient management in China. A review

Abstract

-China is facing one of the largest challenges of this century to continue to increase annual cereal production to about 600 Mt by 2030 to ensure food security with shrinking cropland and limited resources, while maintaining or improving soil fertility, and protecting the environment. Rich experiences in integrated and efficient utilization of different strategies of crop rotation, intercropping, and all possible nutrient resources accumulated by Chinese farmers in traditional farming systems have been gradually abandoned and nutrient management shifted to over-reliance on synthetic fertilizers. China is now the world's largest producer, consumer and importer of chemical fertilizers. Overapplication of nitrogen (N) is common in intensive agricultural regions, and current N-uptake efficiency was reported to be only 28.3, 28.2 and 26.1% for rice, wheat and maize, respectively, and less than 20% in intensive agricultural regions and for fruit trees or vegetable crops. In addition to surface and groundwater pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, over-application of N fertilizers has caused significant soil acidification in major Chinese croplands, decreasing soil pH by 0.13 to 2.20. High yield as a top priority, small-scale farming, lack of temporal synchronization of nutrient supply and crop demand, lack of effective extension systems, and hand application of fertilizers by farmers are possible reasons leading to the over-application problems. There is little doubt that current nutrient management practices are not sustainable and more efficient management systems need to be developed. A review of long-term experiments conducted around the world indicated that chemical fertilizer alone is not enough to improve or maintain soil fertility at high levels and the soil acidification problem caused by overapplication of synthetic N fertilizers can be reduced if more fertilizer N is applied as NO − 3 relative to ammonium-or urea-based N fertilizers. Organic fertilizers can improve soil fertility and quality, but long-term application at high rates can also lead to more nitrate leaching, and accumulation of P, if not managed well. Well-managed combination of chemical and organic fertilizers can overcome the disadvantages of applying single source of fertilizers and sustainably achieve higher crop yields, improve soil fertility, alleviate soil acidification problems, and increase nutrient-use efficiency compared with only using chemical fertilizers. Crop yield can be increased through temporal diversity using crop rotation strategies compared with continuous cropping and legume-based cropping systems can reduce carbon and nitrogen losses. Crop yield responses to N fertilization can vary significantly from year to year due to variation in weather conditions and indigenous N supply, thus the commonly adopted prescriptive approach to N management needs to be replaced by a responsive in-season management approach based on diagnosis of crop growth, N status and demand. A crop sensor-based in-season site-specific N mana...

The Impact of Agricultural Extension on Farmer Nutrient Management Behavior in Chinese Rice Production: A Household-Level Analysis

“…In accordance with previous studies, farmer nutrient management behavior is measured in terms of the total amount of fertilizer used, the total amount of inorganic fertilizer used, the percentage of organic fertilizer used and the percentage of soil-testing-based fertilizer used [10,36]. Table 2 reports the nutrient management behavior of participants and non-participants in rice production.…”

“…Most of the more than 200 million farmers in China are poorly educated, are relatively old, and operate very small holdings (an average 0.1-0.5 ha of agricultural land per farm) [11]; second, China has lacked a wide-reaching and functional extension system. According to one report, there were only 11 technicians providing services for 20,000 farmers in one county; at the township level, the extension personnel, if any, have become fertilizer salesmen or have become engaged in other unrelated activities (e.g., family planning) [15]; third, the extension system in China generally takes a top-down approach, determining what technologies should be transferred at the central, provincial or county level without the sufficient involvement of local farmers [13,36]; fourth, increasing agricultural production and food security have been the primary objectives of the agricultural extension system. Extension officers usually only promote programs intended to increase crop yields, as do most governmental incentives [37].…”

Ecosystem Services in Biologically Diversified versus Conventional Farming Systems: Benefits, Externalities, and Trade-Offs

“…Conventional agricultural systems, especially grains, have experienced dramatically declining fertilizer use efficiencies over several decades, requiring large increases in synthetic fertilizer application rates simply to maintain yields, with attendant increases in nutrient loss (Tilman et al 2002, Miao et al 2011). Loss of agricultural nitrogen and phosphorus to air and water cause severe environmental and human health problems, including eutrophication of fresh and marine waters, the emission of greenhouse gasses, and the depletion of stratospheric ozone (Tilman et al 2002, Townsend et al 2003, Diaz and Rosenberg 2008, Park et al 2012.…”

Impact of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies on Winter Wheat and Cropping System Performance across Precipitation Gradients in the Inland Pacific Northwest, USA

“…In addition to conserving soil water, the reduction or elimination of tillage is a strategy to combat water and wind erosion (Singh et al, 2012;Williams et al, 2014) in combination with continuous annual cropping (Thorne et al, 2003;Feng et al, 2011). Heterogeneous topography also challenges nutrient management due to significant variability in plant-soil-nutrient interactions and crop performance (Fiez et al, 1994(Fiez et al, , 1995 with opportunities for site specific N fertilizer management to mitigate differences in water and N use efficiencies across the landscape (Miao et al, 2011). A combination of these alternative cropping system strategies may increase productivity and economic returns (Tanaka et al, 2002;Alam et al, 2015;Babu et al, 2016), and multiple strategies may be needed (Kirkegaard and Hunt, 2010;Snapp et al, 2010).…”