1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00042-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term experience with the double-cuff AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If other causes of increasing incontinence have been ruled out by this protocol and the number of pump cycles to completely empty the cuff has increased, then urethral atrophy under the cuff has occurred. Possible revision procedures for this problem include cuff down sizing [17], tandem cuff placement [18], or transcorporeal cuff placement [19]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If other causes of increasing incontinence have been ruled out by this protocol and the number of pump cycles to completely empty the cuff has increased, then urethral atrophy under the cuff has occurred. Possible revision procedures for this problem include cuff down sizing [17], tandem cuff placement [18], or transcorporeal cuff placement [19]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,72,73 (C) Even catheters suitably placed for short periods can be detrimental to the long-term survival of the device. Authors have demonstrated a greater risk of erosion in patients who were catheterized for more than 48 hours at any time after the placement of the AUS.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with bladder dysfunction (e.g., decreased compliance, detrusor overactivity) appear to bene fi t to similar degrees compared to patients with normal bladder function [ 198,239,245,251,252 ] . Despite evidence suggesting double-cuff placement for severe incontinence may improve urinary control or quality of life outcomes [253][254][255] , longer-term follow-up suggests patients may not experience better outcomes and may be more likely to require surgical revision [ 256 ] . Revisions are necessary over time; however, most patients still maintain satisfaction following repeated surgery and can achieve satisfactory urinary outcomes [257][258][259] .…”
Section: Arti Fi Cial Urinary Sphinctermentioning
confidence: 99%