Long-term evolution of a carbonate reservoir submitted to fresh, saline and thermal waters interactions – Jurassic carbonates in the coastal area of the Gulf of Lion margin (southern France)

Abstract

Securing and managing underground water resources requires a good knowledge of the structure, texture and connections of the reservoir, in order to develop realistic and reliable hydrogeological models. On the coastline of the Gulf of Lion Margin (S. France), the Balaruc-les-Bains deep karst reservoir is subjected to interactions between fresh, marine and deep thermal waters, respectively. Water resource usage for drinking, spa resort, and fish-farming raises important economic and social issues. These were addressed by an integrated research program, involving drilling of an exploratory borehole across the Jurassic carbonate reservoir. This contribution analyses the 750 m cores, in order to (i) characterise the architecture and evolution of the karst reservoir and (ii) investigate the paleo-fluids circulations, witnessed by calcite and dolomite mineralization in the fractures, karst cavities, and as cement of tectonic beccia. The structure of the reservoir is characterised by the superposition of several aquifers separated by marly intervals. At shallow level, the initial grainstone is incompletely dolomitized in metre-thick intervals, while limestone in the 210–340 m interval was completely dolomitized at an early stage. Dolomite has been subjected to penetrative extensional cataclastic deformation, while the preserved limestone is affected by normal faulting, resulting from NNE–SSW extension. Distinct types of karsts have been documented, from the top of the reservoir (paleo-lapiaz filled with Burdigalian marine marls), down to 500 m depth (paleo-endokarst filled with continental silts). The upper reservoir (75–150 m) is intensely karstified, and includes 0.1 to 1 m-wide cavities, where present day water fluxes are documented. Analyses of calcite and dolomite crystallisation under natural light and cathodoluminescence indicate precipitation from distinct fluids: formation water in chemical equilibrium with the host rock, water rich in oxides and hydroxides, ascending hydrothermal fluid and corrosive water of meteoric origin. Alternate dolomitization and calcitization observed in the upper reservoir suggests alternate flows of karstic freshwater and marine salt-water. Vertical, metre-long and centimetre wide open cracks are presently used for large water flows; several generations of syntaxial calcite growth provide evidence for varying chemistry of the circulating fluids. Structural cross cutting relationships allowed us to establish a relative chronology of events, which can be correlated with the regional geodynamic evolution. The study reveals that the present-day reservoir architecture results from the superimposition of structures formed during the Early Cretaceous extension, Maastrichtian-Eocene Pyrenean shortening, and Oligocene rifting of the Gulf of Lion. The reservoir was also shaped by successive karstification episodes and marine transgressions. Although the present-day hydrological system is controlled by, and reactivates structures inherited from a long-term evolution, it is characterised by frequent turn-overs of the water flow, tuned by high-frequency external forcings such as sea-level changes driven by Pleistocene glacio-eustasy, or varying precipitation rates.

Dataset on onshore groundwaters and offshore submarine spring of a Mediterranean karst aquifer during flow reversal and saltwater intrusion

“…The Vise submarine spring (BSS002JDMR) located in the Thau lagoon (southern France) is one of the most important natural outlets of the Jurassic karstified limestone aquifer [2] , the other overflow outlets of the karst aquifer being the springs of Cauvy (BSS002JDNJ), Ambressac (BSS002JECB) and Issanka (BSS002JCUL) located onshore on the peninsula of Balaruc [3] .…”

“…The submarine spring flows into the Thau lagoon at a depth of 29.5 m [4] , at the level of a bench of shell limestone attributed to the Miocene [2] ( Fig. 3 ).…”