2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term efficacy and safety of 12 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis compared with 3 months after lung transplantation: A single-center, long-term follow-up analysis from a randomized, controlled cytomegalovirus prevention trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the rates of CMV infection and ganciclovir resistance among CMV-infected patients were 28% and 9.4%, respectively, despite receipt of valganciclovir prophylaxis for a median of 7 months (range, 4 to 21 months). The rate of CMV infection was higher than in a recent multicenter study of extended valganciclovir prophylaxis (17,18). Taken together, the data demonstrate that ganciclovir-resistant CMV infections remained a major cause of morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Third, the rates of CMV infection and ganciclovir resistance among CMV-infected patients were 28% and 9.4%, respectively, despite receipt of valganciclovir prophylaxis for a median of 7 months (range, 4 to 21 months). The rate of CMV infection was higher than in a recent multicenter study of extended valganciclovir prophylaxis (17,18). Taken together, the data demonstrate that ganciclovir-resistant CMV infections remained a major cause of morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Interestingly, UL97 mutations were detected in 2.9% of lung transplant recipients randomized to the extended valganciclovir arm of the multicenter study (17), which was virtually identical to the 2.6% rate among our lung transplant recipients. Ganciclovir resistance was not reported in a follow-up study of a subset of patients from the earlier trial, who were from a single center (18). Nevertheless, our data showcase that concerns over the potential for ganciclovir resistance with extended valganciclovir prophylaxis are legitimate (2,17,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the association was small, and not adjusted for potential risk factors for CMV disease such as donor and recipient CMV serostatus 31 , type, timing and dose of immunosuppressive therapy 28, 29, 32 , or CMV prevention practices 14, 15 . It is possible that native lung infections such as bacterial pneumonia and fungal infections result in increased inflammation 33, 34 , thereby leading to transactivation of latent CMV in the transplanted lung and subsequent CMV disease 26, 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An international consensus committee convened in 2010 recommended at least 6 months of anti-CMV prophylaxis for CMV-seronegative lung transplant recipients that received lungs from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-) and 3 to 6 months of anti-CMV prophylaxis for CMV seropositive recipients (R+) 13 . A randomized controlled trial that demonstrated the superiority of 12 months over 3 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis in preventing CMV disease among D+/R- and R+ lung transplant recipients 14, 15 supports even longer treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%