2003
DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.27.1.s1.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Effects of the <I>Positive Action</I>® Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
71
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that the Positive Action program reduces violent behavior, substance use, bullying, suspensions and absenteeism; increases math and reading standardized test scores; and positively impacts student-reported positive affect, life satisfaction, depression, and disaffection with learning, as well as teacher-rated academic ability, motivation, and school-level absenteeism Beets et al, 2009;Flay and Allred, 2003;Lewis et al, 2013;Li et al, 2011;Snyder et al, 2010). The likelihood that the Positive Action program will yield benefits greater than the costs is 87 percent, with the annual estimated per participant cost of $444 (in 2016 dollars) (Washington State Institute for Public Policy, 2017e).…”
Section: Academic and Social Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that the Positive Action program reduces violent behavior, substance use, bullying, suspensions and absenteeism; increases math and reading standardized test scores; and positively impacts student-reported positive affect, life satisfaction, depression, and disaffection with learning, as well as teacher-rated academic ability, motivation, and school-level absenteeism Beets et al, 2009;Flay and Allred, 2003;Lewis et al, 2013;Li et al, 2011;Snyder et al, 2010). The likelihood that the Positive Action program will yield benefits greater than the costs is 87 percent, with the annual estimated per participant cost of $444 (in 2016 dollars) (Washington State Institute for Public Policy, 2017e).…”
Section: Academic and Social Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mutually beneficial features of the relations that enabled thriving to emerge were based on the idea that PYD occurred when there was an alignment between attributes of youth that constituted strengths of the individual (as, for instance, operationalized by characteristics such as intentional self-regulation skills, hopeful future expectations, and school engagement; Lerner et al 2013) and the features of the context that were developmental assets (for instance, warmth and monitoring by engaged parents or sustained relations with a caring and competent mentor or youth program practitioner). This strengths-based approach to youth development in general and to the understanding of thriving in particular was a frame for the key approaches to the design of PYD programs and to instances of such programs that were derived from such theory-predicated approaches (e.g., Catalano et al 2002Catalano et al , 2004Flay 2002;Flay and Allred 2003;Kurtines et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary findings indicate that PA can positively influence school attendance, behaviour and achievement. Two previous quasi-experimental studies utilizing archival school-level data (Flay & Allred, 2003) reported beneficial effects on student achievement (e.g., math, reading, and science) and serious problem behaviours (e.g., suspensions and violence rates). As practitioners, policymakers and researchers have implemented programs and sought to raise academic achievement and to address negative behaviours among the youth, an increasing amount of evidence indicates a relationship among multiple behaviours (Botvin, Griffin, & Nichols, 2006;Catalano, Berglund, Ryan, Lonczak, & Hawkins, 2004;Flay, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these programs currently being used nationally is the Positive Action (PA) program. PA is a comprehensive school-wide Social-emotional and Character Development (SACD) program (Flay & Allred, 2003) which was developed to specifically target the positive development of student behaviour and character. Based on prior studies, PA has been recognized in the character-education report by the U.S. Department of Education's What Works Clearing house (2007) as the only "character education" program in the nation to meet the evidentiary requirements for improving both academics and behaviour.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%