Long term effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion without performing osteotomy of the pterygoid plates

Seeberger, Robin; Kater, Wolfgang; Davids, Rolf; Thiele, Oliver C.

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2009.07.003

Cited by 61 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 22 publications

(31 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[10][11][12][13] Koudstaal et al 14 stated that SARME without pterygoid separation results in a different pattern of expansion. They believed that the ratio of anterior to posterior expansion is higher in patients with no pterygoid separation than in SARME patients who underwent pterygoid osteotomy, and this might be considered as an individualized treatment to achieve more distraction on either the posterior or the anterior level.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex

Sygouros¹,

Motro

Uğurlu

et al. 2014

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex

Sygouros¹,

Motro

Uğurlu

et al. 2014

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The pterygoid plates are also a considerable site of resistance but because of the increased risk of injuring the pterygoid plexus by the osteotomy, some chose not to, without losing much mobility. By not releasing the pterygoid junction, the pattern of opening of the maxillary halves is more V-shaped with the point of the V located dorsally [33][34][35][36][37].…”

Section: Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion (Sarme)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion

Aktop¹,

Gönül²,

Garip³

et al. 2015

A Textbook of Advanced Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Volume 2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Also, the scope of surgical intervention can vary, from partial osteotomy to complete cutting of bone connections around the osteotomy site. 11,12 Another group includes multisegmental maxillary osteotomy, a corrective treatment of facio-occlusal deformities during one procedure. 13,14 Each method bears a risk of specific complications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes in transverse tooth and bone dimensions during transversal maxillary hypoplasia treatment by maxillary distraction osteogenesis using a device installed on a bone

Dowgierd¹,

Smektała

Ulański

et al. 2015

Polish Annals of Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Available online xxx Keywords:Maxillary hypoplasia SARME Transversal hypoplasia Distraction osteogensis Transpalatal distraction (TPD) a b s t r a c t Introduction: A transverse maxillary hypoplasia is a deformation often observed in orthodontic patients. Various techniques are used to treat this problem. Aim: The aim is to present results of transversal maxillary hypoplasia treatment with a bone-borne device. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis included 27 patients, age 17-26 years (17 AE 2.6). Dental casts and X-ray were made before operation period (T1), and post distraction (T2). On the casts were determined points: on cusps of maxillary canines (3-3), first maxillary premolars (4-4) and first maxillary molars (6-6). Angles and distances were measured on standard posterior-anterior (PA) images. Results and discussion: At the 3-3 level, the average expansion was 5.8 mm, at the 4-4 level the average expansion was 7.3 mm, at the level of 6-6 palatial cusps the average expansion was 6.11 mm. Measurements in the PA X-ray were performed at the nasal cavity, with the average dimensions being 29.03 mm before treatment, and 31.95 mm post-treatment. The angle was measured between first molars (6-6_ang) and the anterior nasal spine before and after treatment, with a significant change in that angle from 98.938 on average to 102.898 after distraction. Conclusions: Use of maxillary distraction osteogenesis with bone-borne device in maxillary expansion is an effective treatment method. Maxillary expansion results in increase of the nasal cavity. Used distractor is easy to operate for the patient.# 2015 Warmińsko-Mazurska Izba Lekarska w Olsztynie. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o.All rights reserved.Please cite this article in press as: Dowgierd K, et al. Changes in transverse tooth and bone dimensions during transversal maxillary hypoplasia treatment by maxillary distraction osteogenesis using a device installed on a bone.

show abstract

Long term effects of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion without performing osteotomy of the pterygoid plates

Cited by 61 publications

References 22 publications

Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex

Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex

Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion

Changes in transverse tooth and bone dimensions during transversal maxillary hypoplasia treatment by maxillary distraction osteogenesis using a device installed on a bone

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About