2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of optimized fertilization, tillage and crop rotation on soil fertility, crop yield and economic profit on the Loess Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STFT is based on soil nutrients and fertilizer demand for crop growth, targeted fertilization on demand. Studies found that STFR can reduce the misuse of chemical fertilizers and also improve grain output and soil fertility [ [55] , [56] , [57] ]. This means that technology adoption can increase farm income and reduce costly inputs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STFT is based on soil nutrients and fertilizer demand for crop growth, targeted fertilization on demand. Studies found that STFR can reduce the misuse of chemical fertilizers and also improve grain output and soil fertility [ [55] , [56] , [57] ]. This means that technology adoption can increase farm income and reduce costly inputs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I t is the nominal fixed asset formation, P is the fixed asset investment value index, δ t is the depreciation rate, which is taken as 9.6 percent using the LSDV method to estimate Equations ( 4), ( 5) and (7) are brought in to obtain τ. τ > 0 represents the under-allocation of resources and vice versa for over-allocation. This paper further uses a coupled synergy model to measure the composite index of resource mismatch as follows:…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the differences in production between plantation and livestock, this paper divides the plantation and livestock zones for heterogeneity analysis using the 400 mm isoprecipitation line as the boundary. Columns (7) and ( 8) of Table 7 show that the estimated coefficients for plantation and livestock zones are significant at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively, suggesting that the CRFS policy reduces the intensity of agricultural carbon emissions in both plantation and livestock zones, and it is more effective in plantation zones than in livestock zones. The possible economic explanation is that the plantation and livestock zones have upgraded their traditional agricultural production facilities through digitalisation, which promotes the precise management of crop growth and livestock rearing and reduces chemical inputs and energy consumption.…”
Section: Comparison Of Rainfall In Different Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations