The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.15.5507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Effects of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Radiation for Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Abstract: HL accounts for most deaths among patients surviving HDT and ASCR. Survivors of ASCR had an elevated risk of SM compared with the cancer risk in the general population, but when compared with patients with HL in SEER, the risk was less pronounced.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Finally, we have proposed that chemosensitive disease should be defined by pretransplant 18 fluorodeoxy glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) status; those patients with a negative scan have a 5-year EFS of 75% compared with 25% for those patients with improvement of CT but with persistent FDG-PET positivity. [4][5][6][7][8] Similar FDG-PET data were recently confirmed by the transplant group from Washington University. 9 The current comprehensive study incorporates non-cross-resistant SLT and individually tailored RT and HDT/ASCT.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…4 Finally, we have proposed that chemosensitive disease should be defined by pretransplant 18 fluorodeoxy glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) status; those patients with a negative scan have a 5-year EFS of 75% compared with 25% for those patients with improvement of CT but with persistent FDG-PET positivity. [4][5][6][7][8] Similar FDG-PET data were recently confirmed by the transplant group from Washington University. 9 The current comprehensive study incorporates non-cross-resistant SLT and individually tailored RT and HDT/ASCT.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Detailed long-term toxicity associated with high-dose chemotherapy and radiation at our institution was previously reported. 14 This analysis represents the largest series of patients followed prospectively on IRB approved trials and treated with uniform ST. Consistent with other reports, the outcome for FI-positive patients is poor with median EFS of 11 months and 5-year EFS of 31%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the cumulative incidence of SPM, data from retrospective studies are difficult to interpret because of differences in median follow-up, selection of patients (all transplanted patients or only patients who survived ≥2 years after ASCT), period of inclusion, number of treatment lines before ASCT, heterogeneity of treatments, conditioning regimens and source of stem-cells. 7,[17][18][19] Given this, the cumulative incidences of SPM in retrospective studies ranged from 5.8% to 14.7% at 10 years, and from 8% to 15.3% at 15 years. In the present study, considering patients who did not relapse after completing single ASCT (intermediate-risk group), the 10-and 15-year cumulative incidences of SPM were 16% and 24%, respectively, which are higher than in retrospective studies.…”
Section: A B D Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16] In contrast, only a few retrospective studies have addressed long-term effects after ASCT for relapsed or refractory HL. 17,18 Thus, long-term prospective data are lacking for first-relapsed or refractory HL treated with ASCT. Concerning the cumulative incidence of SPM, data from retrospective studies are difficult to interpret because of differences in median follow-up, selection of patients (all transplanted patients or only patients who survived ≥2 years after ASCT), period of inclusion, number of treatment lines before ASCT, heterogeneity of treatments, conditioning regimens and source of stem-cells.…”
Section: A B D Cmentioning
confidence: 99%