2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-004-3654-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on species composition and productivity of a southern African C4 dominated grassland in the vicinity of a CO2 exhalation

Abstract: We describe the long-term effects of a CO 2 exhalation, created more than 70 years ago, on a natural C 4 dominated sub-tropical grassland in terms of ecosystem structure and functioning. We tested whether longterm CO 2 enrichment changes the competitive balance between plants with C 3 and C 4 photosynthetic pathways and how CO 2 enrichment has affected species composition, plant growth responses, leaf properties and soil nutrient, carbon and water dynamics. Long-term effects of elevated CO 2 on plant community… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…C 3 grasses are generally reported to be more nutritious than C 4 grasses, reflecting higher nitrogen and hence protein concentration, as well as lower dry matter contents (Barbehenn et al 2004). Nutritional quality is affected by increase in CO 2 , particularly in C 3 grasses, as the latter tend to have greater decreases in nitrogen concentration (Stock et al 2005) and greater increases in non-structural carbohydrates than C 4 grasses. Despite this, C 3 grasses tend to remain more nutritious than C 4 grasses.…”
Section: Influence Of Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…C 3 grasses are generally reported to be more nutritious than C 4 grasses, reflecting higher nitrogen and hence protein concentration, as well as lower dry matter contents (Barbehenn et al 2004). Nutritional quality is affected by increase in CO 2 , particularly in C 3 grasses, as the latter tend to have greater decreases in nitrogen concentration (Stock et al 2005) and greater increases in non-structural carbohydrates than C 4 grasses. Despite this, C 3 grasses tend to remain more nutritious than C 4 grasses.…”
Section: Influence Of Climate Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely held view is that the relative response of C4 plants to elevated CO 2 is usually smaller than that for C3 species, as C4 appears to be CO 2 saturated at ambient CO 2 level and shows very low responsiveness to higher CO 2 concentration (Adriana et al, 1998;Parry et al, 2004;Mera et al, 2006). However, from the metaanalysis and long-term effect analysis, this is not always true for some wild C4 species, and the differences in CO 2 response between C3 and C4 grass species are not as large as the current perception (Wand et al, 1999;Stock et al, 2005). It is only absolutely true for growth under non-stressful environmental conditions (Ghannoum et al, 2000;Kim et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Shifts in composition of grass species following the C3 and C4 photosynthetic pathways are presumed to be accompanied by global climate trends such as elevated temperatures and atmospheric CO 2 (Stock et al 2005). The C3 and C4 types of grasses differ in their forage nutrient status and will respond differently to a changing climatic factor (Barbehenn et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forage nutrient variables, which are of importance, include limiting nutrients such as nitrogen (N), crude protein (CP), moisture, and non-digestible fibres (neutral fibre) that constrain the intake rate of herbivores (Grant et al 2010). Moreover, differences in the forage nutrient concentration between C3 and C4 grass dominated landscapes will affect the conditions and capacity of an agro-ecological system to support herbivore populations (Stock et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%