Low sexual assertiveness has been proposed as a possible mechanism through which sexual revictimization occurs, yet evidence for this has been mixed. In this study, prospective path analysis was used to examine the relationship between sexual refusal assertiveness and sexual victimization over time among a community sample of women. Results provide support for a reciprocal relationship, with historical victimization predicting low sexual assertiveness and low sexual assertiveness predicting subsequent victimization. The effect of recent sexual victimization on subsequent sexual assertiveness also was replicated prospectively. These findings suggest that strengthening sexual assertiveness may help reduce vulnerability to future victimization.
Keywordsrevictimization; sexual assault; sexual assertiveness A large body of research reveals that women who have experienced sexual victimization are at increased risk of being revictimized, yet the mechanisms by which revictimization occurs are not well understood (e.g., Gidycz, Coble, Latham, & Layman, 1993;Gidycz, Hanson, & Layman, 1995;Messman-Moore & Long, 2000. Identifying and understanding these mechanisms are critical to prevention. Psychological vulnerability is thought to be one of the mechanisms through which women's risk of sexual revictimization is increased (see MessmanMoore & Long [2003] for a review). Psychological vulnerability refers to psychological or social vulnerabilities within the victim (e.g., low self-esteem, depression, anxiety, low assertiveness) that potential perpetrators are likely to identify and act upon. This study focuses on one aspect of psychological vulnerability, sexual assertiveness, because unlike depression or anxiety, assertiveness may be amenable to change through behavioral intervention. To maximize its potential for intervention, a better understanding of the relationship between sexual assertiveness and sexual victimization is needed. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between sexual assertiveness and sexual victimization over time.Considering the role of assertiveness in sexual victimization has intuitive appeal. It is logical to assume that women who are low in assertiveness have a difficult time refusing unwanted sexual advances and may be targeted by aggressive men. Conversely, theories regarding the sequelae of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and other victimization have proposed that experiences from which one is unable to escape or avoid can result in feelings of powerlessness or learned helplessness, potentially leading the victim to believe that it is impossible to avoid or prevent future victimization (Finkelhor, 1987;Peterson & Seligman, 1983). In addition to fostering psychological distress such as depression and anxiety, such powerlessness may be translated behaviorally into a lack of assertiveness in sexual situations. It may also be that the relationship between sexual victimization and assertiveness is reciprocal. That is, history of sexual victimization contributes to low sexual ass...