2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-0011-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Effects of Acoustic Trauma on Electrically Evoked Otoacoustic Emission

Abstract: Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions (EEOAEs) are sounds measured in the ear canal when alternating current (AC) stimulation is passed into the cochlea. These sounds are attributed to the motile responses of outer hair cells (OHCs). The EEOAE has characteristic amplitude, phase, and fine structure. Multicomponent analysis of the EEOAE shows short (SDC) and long delay components (LDC) that are thought to originate from OHCs near the AC stimulating site and from OHCs at more remote locations, respectively. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the exact site from which the movements originated was not assessed in this study, the most likely source of force generation would be from outer hair cells (Halsey et al 2005;Liberman et al 2004). Force generation by outer hair cell somatic electromotility and/or stereociliary motility within the normal organ of Corti in response to electrical stimuli is called reverse transduction, and these processes have been postulated to underlie the cochlear amplifier (Fettiplace and Hackney 2006).…”
Section: Reverse Transduction In the Mutant Mousementioning
confidence: 94%
“…While the exact site from which the movements originated was not assessed in this study, the most likely source of force generation would be from outer hair cells (Halsey et al 2005;Liberman et al 2004). Force generation by outer hair cell somatic electromotility and/or stereociliary motility within the normal organ of Corti in response to electrical stimuli is called reverse transduction, and these processes have been postulated to underlie the cochlear amplifier (Fettiplace and Hackney 2006).…”
Section: Reverse Transduction In the Mutant Mousementioning
confidence: 94%
“…To estimate the delay components of the EEOAEs, we used a multicomponent analysis (MCA) as developed by and applied by Halsey et al (2005). In Fig.…”
Section: Multicomponent Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On reaching its CF place, the wave is regenerated through the action of the cochlear amplifier before traveling back to the ear canal . and Halsey et al (2005) showed the SDC of EEOAEs to be extremely robust, surviving almost complete elimination of the hair cells. The LDC, however, is more vulnerable and seems to better reflect the physiological state of the cochlea (Halsey et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Stimulation frequency was fine tuned such that the emission frequency was 5.6, 8, 11.2, or 16 kHz, and emission frequency and amplitude were determined using a lock-in-amplifier ͑SR530; Stanford Research Systems͒. For the ninth animal, current remained fixed between 0 ͑noise floor͒ and 30 A; however, stimulation frequency ͑controlled by an SRS 830 lock-in amplifier͒ was stepped from 1 to 35 kHz in 22 Hz increments ͑1 s dwell time per frequency increment͒, with a time constant of 3 s ͑as described by Halsey et al, 2006͒. Development of the latter procedure significantly improved frequency resolution for measuring the EEOAE response.…”
Section: E Electrically Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%