Long-Term Effects of a Parent and Student Intervention on Alcohol Use in Adolescents

Koning, Ina M.; Eijnden, Regina J. van den; Verdurmen, Jacqueline; Engels, Rutger C. M. E.; Vollebergh, Wilma

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.030

Cited by 88 publications

(102 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…34 Furthermore, research from the USA found that targeting young people and parents simultaneously but separately was effective in postponing the onset of heavy drinking among adolescents. 35,36 However, the results are equivocal, with some studies showing effectiveness and others not, and questions remain about the applicability to the UK setting. 27 As has been shown, there is limited Various screening measures have been used with young people to identify those who are at risk from their drinking including using measures of total alcohol consumption, levels of binge drinking and alcohol-related injury levels.…”

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 97%

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Newbury‐Birch

Scott

O’Donnell

et al. 2014

Public Health Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14-15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full PHR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/phr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Public Health Research journalReports are published in Public Health Research (PHR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PHR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Public Health Research are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. PHR programmeThe Public Health Research (PHR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), evaluates public health interventions, providing new knowledge on the benefits, costs, acceptability and wider impacts of non-NHS interventions intended to improve the health of the public and reduce inequalities in health. The scope of the programme is multi-disciplinary and broad, covering a range of interventions that improve public health. The Public Health Research programme also complements the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme which has a growing portfolio evaluating NHS public health interventions.For more information about the PHR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/phr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the PHR programme as project number 10/3002/07. The contractual start date was in October 2011. The final report began editorial review in September 2013 and was accepted for publication in June 2014. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PHR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors,...

show abstract

Section: Primary and Secondary Prevention Interventions For Risky Drimentioning

confidence: 97%

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Newbury‐Birch

Scott

O’Donnell

et al. 2014

Public Health Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These results indicate that alcoholspecifi c parenting is not a mere marker of general parenting but a distinct and infl uential predictor. Therefore, because of its documented links with adolescent alcohol use (e.g., Jackson et al, 1999) and its demonstrated malleability (Ennett et al, 2001;Koning et al, 2011), alcohol-specifi c parenting research has implications for prevention and intervention designs.…”

Section: Abstract Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Alcohol-Specific Parenting as a Mechanism of Parental Drinking and Alcohol Use Disorder Risk on Adolescent Alcohol Use Onset

Handley

Chassin

2013

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective:The primary aim of the current study was to examine three dimensions of alcohol-specifi c parenting (anti-alcohol parenting strategies, parental legitimacy in regulating adolescent drinking, and parental disclosure of negative alcohol experiences) as mechanisms in the prospective relations between parental drinking and alcohol use disorder (recovered, current, and never diagnosed) and adolescent alcohol use initiation. Method: Participants were from an ongoing longitudinal study of the intergenerational transmission of alcoholism. Structural equation modeling was used to test a maternal model (n = 268 adolescents and their mothers) and a paternal model (n = 204 adolescents and their fathers) of alcohol-specifi c parenting. Results: Results indicated that higher levels of drinking among mothers and current alcohol use disorder among fathers were related to more frequent parental disclosure of personal negative experiences with alcohol. Maternal disclosure of negative alcohol experiences mediated the effect of maternal drinking on adolescent onset of alcohol use such that more disclosure predicted a greater likelihood of adolescent drinking initiation at follow-up over and above general parenting. In addition, currently alcoholic mothers were perceived as having less legitimate authority to regulate adolescent drinking, and low levels of legitimacy among fathers was predictive of drinking onset among adolescents. Conclusions: Alcohol-specifi c parenting is a distinct and infl uential predictor of adolescent alcohol use initiation that is partially shaped by parents' own drinking experiences. Moreover, parental conversations about their own personal experiences with alcohol may not represent a form of parent-child communication about drinking that deters adolescent drinking. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 74, 684-693, 2013)

show abstract

“…In a practical sense, this implies that strict rule setting and good parent-child communication are important preventative targets for parents. In addition, interventions simultaneously targeting self-control in adolescents and alcohol-specifi c parenting may foster even better outcomes (Koning et al, 2009(Koning et al, , 2011a(Koning et al, , 2013. This study is the fi rst to provide more insight into the mechanism of selfcontrol underlying the relationship between alcohol-specifi c parenting and adolescents' alcohol use.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In fact, strict rule setting is the strongest predictor of particularly early (Habib et al, 2010;Koning et al, 2010a;van der Vorst et al, 2006) and also later (Abar and Turrisi, 2008) alcohol use. Several alcohol intervention studies targeting parental rule setting have indeed revealed signifi cant effects on adolescents' drinking behavior (e.g., Koning et al, 2009Koning et al, , 2011aKoning et al, , 2013Turrisi et al, 2009;Wood et al, 2010). These rules have to be conveyed to the adolescent through communication.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Alcohol-Specific Parenting, Adolescents' Self-Control, and Alcohol Use: A Moderated Mediation Model

Koning

Eijnden

Vollebergh

2014

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective: There is convincing evidence that parental rules about alcohol are important in curbing adolescents' alcohol use. However, little is known about the mechanisms through which the direct link between alcohol-specifi c parenting and alcohol use is obtained. In this study, we investigated the mediating effect of adolescent self-control on the relationship between alcohol-specifi c rules and adolescents' drinking behavior and whether this mediation effect depends on the level of quality of communication. Method: A total of 883 adolescents participated in this longitudinal study at ages 13, 14, and 15 years. Results: Strict rules predicted lower rates of drinking, but no direct effect of the quality of communication on adolescents' alcohol use was found. A higher level of self-control was related to lower rates of drinking in adolescents. The indirect effect of rules about alcohol through adolescents' self-control was statistically signifi cant, yet only in adolescents with high qualitative parent-child communication about alcohol. In adolescents with low quality of parent-child communication, self-control was not related to drinking. Conclusions: These fi ndings imply that strict rule setting in combination with qualitative parent-child communication is an important target for prevention. In addition, fi ndings point at the importance of high qualitative parent-child communication for adolescents' motivation to engage in self-control to avoid drinking. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 75, 16-23, 2014)

show abstract

Long-Term Effects of a Parent and Student Intervention on Alcohol Use in Adolescents

Cited by 88 publications

References 26 publications

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

A pilot feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent hazardous drinking in young people aged 14–15 years in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Alcohol-Specific Parenting as a Mechanism of Parental Drinking and Alcohol Use Disorder Risk on Adolescent Alcohol Use Onset

Alcohol-Specific Parenting, Adolescents' Self-Control, and Alcohol Use: A Moderated Mediation Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About