2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3454-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects and psychological adjustment: study protocol of a large register-based study on quality of life among survivors of hematological malignancies

Abstract: BackgroundBoth incidence and survival rates of hematological cancers are increasing, leading to a growing number of survivors with specific late and long-term effects. However, relevant research in physical, psychological and social aspects of quality of life is scarce. Existing literature shows that a considerable number of cancer survivors report a relatively high quality of life despite a variety of adverse and persistent symptoms. To date, the reasons for this phenomenon as well as moderating and mediating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All data were collected between June 2015 and August 2017. Further details of the study have been published before (Esser, Kuba, Götze, & Mehnert, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data were collected between June 2015 and August 2017. Further details of the study have been published before (Esser, Kuba, Götze, & Mehnert, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study was part of a large cross-sectional observational survey on hematologic cancer survivors in Germany. A detailed description of the study has been described in a study protocol (Esser et al, 2017a, Esser et al, 2017b, Esser et al, 2017c). Results on quality of life, depression and anxiety have been published elsewhere (Esser et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed modifications can be found elsewhere. 23 Sociodemographic and medical information: Gender, age, diagnosis according to ICD-10, 29 and time since diagnosis were obtained from the cancer registries. Other data (see Table 1) was assessed via self-report.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, the adapted version assessed 24 comorbidities. Detailed modifications can be found elsewhere …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%