Long-Term Effect of Stenting after an Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Procedure

Banhiran, Wish; Sargi, Zoukaa; Collins, William O.; Kaza, Sarita; Casiano, Roy R.

doi:10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2912

Cited by 26 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mucosal grafting showed promising results in two studies but lacked a suitable comparison group . Although stenting has not been shown historically to reduce the rate of postoperative stenosis, newer drug‐eluting stents may show promise. In a recent report, drug‐eluting stents reduced requirements for postoperative interventions in frontal sinus surgery .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unfortunately, the parameters used to decide which procedure is preferred in cases of failure and why, were not addressed by the literature. Stents are rarely used after the EMLP, and they do not appear to reduce the rate of postoperative stenosis 15. Image‐guidance is preferred by most surgeons performing this operation, although its application has not been shown to improve outcomes 16.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, there has been conflicting evidence on their effectiveness. 1305,1309 Controversy remains regarding their effectiveness, when they should be placed, duration of placement, and type of stent employed. 1308 Silastic stents have been associated with biofilm formation postoperatively, which maybe counterproductive in the treatment of CRS.…”

Section: Xd6 Surgical Principles/techniques: Drug Eluting Packingmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Orlandi

Kingdom

Hwang

et al. 2016

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

554

888

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The body of knowledge regarding rhinosinusitis (RS) continues to expand, with rapid growth in number of publications, yet substantial variability in the quality of those presentations. In an effort to both consolidate and critically appraise this information, rhinologic experts from around the world have produced the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR:RS). Methods:Evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs) were developed for scores of topics, using previously reported methodology. Where existing evidence was insufficient for an EBRR, an evidence-based review (EBR) was produced. The sections were then synthesized and the entire manuscript was then reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results:The resulting ICAR:RS document addresses multiple topics in RS, including acute RS (ARS), chronic RS (CRS) with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP and CRSsNP), recurrent acute RS (RARS), acute exacerbation of CRS (AE-CRS), and pediatric RS. Conclusion:As a critical review of the RS literature, ICAR:RS provides a thorough review of pathophysiology and evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment. It also demonstrates the significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology and optimal management of RS. Too o en the foundation upon which these recommendations are based is comprised of lowerlevel evidence. It is our hope that this summary of the evidence in RS will point out where additional research efforts may be directed. C 2016 ARS-AAOA, LLC. Key Words:rhinosinusitis; chronic rhinosinusitis; acute rhinosinusitis; recurrent acute rhinosinusitis; evidence-based medicine; systematic review; endoscopic sinus surgery List of Abbreviations Used

show abstract

Long-Term Effect of Stenting after an Endoscopic Modified Lothrop Procedure

Abstract: Short-term stenting does not appear to reduce the rate of postoperative stenosis of the common frontal ostium after an EMLP.

Cited by 26 publications

References 41 publications

Evolution of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Evolution of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About