2018
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2018-17
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term dynamics of monoterpene synthase activities, monoterpene storage pools and emissions in boreal Scots pine

Abstract: Abstract. Seasonal variations in monoterpene emissions from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) are well documented, and emissions are often shown to follow the incident temperatures due to effects on compound volatility. Recent studies have indicated a link between monoterpene emissions and physiological drivers such as photosynthetic capacity during needle 15 development. The complex interplay between the dynamic changes in the biosynthetic capacity to produce monoterpenes and the temperature-dependent evaporation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the main compounds abundant in needles were released from both provenances, the composition of emitted terpenoids differed from the composition of needle-stored terpenoids. This finding is in good agreement with many studies on other species (Schindler and Kotzias, 1989;Peñuelas and Llusià, 1997;Llusià and Peñuelas, 1998;Geron et al, 2000;Ormeno et al, 2007;Vanhatalo et al, 2018;Yáñez-Serrano et al, 2018) despite also a close correlation between needle terpenoid content and terpenoid emission rates has been described in Douglas fir (Lerdau et al, 1995). The discrepancy between needle terpenoid levels compared to the emitted terpenoids might arise from different volatilities of the compounds, more than on storing structure within the needles (with different resistances for the volatiles), or a contribution of de novo synthesized compounds which has been demonstrated in several conifers (Ghirardo et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Terpene Emissions Are Differentially Affected In Po and MCsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the main compounds abundant in needles were released from both provenances, the composition of emitted terpenoids differed from the composition of needle-stored terpenoids. This finding is in good agreement with many studies on other species (Schindler and Kotzias, 1989;Peñuelas and Llusià, 1997;Llusià and Peñuelas, 1998;Geron et al, 2000;Ormeno et al, 2007;Vanhatalo et al, 2018;Yáñez-Serrano et al, 2018) despite also a close correlation between needle terpenoid content and terpenoid emission rates has been described in Douglas fir (Lerdau et al, 1995). The discrepancy between needle terpenoid levels compared to the emitted terpenoids might arise from different volatilities of the compounds, more than on storing structure within the needles (with different resistances for the volatiles), or a contribution of de novo synthesized compounds which has been demonstrated in several conifers (Ghirardo et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Terpene Emissions Are Differentially Affected In Po and MCsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The trends for the other compounds formed in the enzyme assays were less clear which might at least partially be due to either very low enzyme activities (for formation of isopulegol, β-citronellol, β-pinene) or low abundances of these terpenoids in needles of the PO provenance (nerolidol, geraniol). Similar inconsistencies between TPS activities and terpenoid levels in needles and leaves were found in Pinus sylvestris (Vanhatalo et al, 2018) and Rosmarinus officinalis (Peñuelas and Llusià, 1997). The observed reduced amounts of many other terpenoids in needles of thermally stressed PO which were not found in the in vitro enzyme assays, might be due to emission losses of these compounds from leaf internal storage pools during the initial phases of the experiment.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tree phenology strongly changes in spring, which is known as an important player in changing the seasonality of BVOC emissions (e.g. (Fischbach et al, 2002;Noe et al, 2012;Grote et al, 2014;Vanhatalo et al, 2018). 8) Seasonality: I find two days of measurements of one unique tree, not representative C3 for describing seasonal emission during summer.…”
Section: Specific Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%