2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-005-0015-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term development of the radionuclide exposure of murine rodent populations in Belarus after the Chernobyl accident

Abstract: As a determinant of the associated health risks, the behavior of radionuclides in natural ecosystems needs to be better understood. Therefore, the activity concentration of various long-lived radionuclides released due to the Chernobyl accident, and the corresponding contributions to the whole-body dose rate, was studied as a function of time in mammalian indicator species inhabiting the natural forest ecosystems of Belarus, the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) and the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the opinion concerning isolation of radiogenic groups of mice and voles in the Eastern Urals radiocontaminated Reserve is erroneous. Our results are supported by data [18] about significantly lower activity concentrations of 137 Cs and 134 Cs in yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollus Melchior, 1834) than bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus Shreber, 1780) in Belarus after the Chernobyl Accident. It was also established that in the EURT zone absorbed doses, which have been accumulated in molevoles in the course both the pre-reproductive period of life and for the whole life span were significantly higher (up to 30 times) than in mice (table 1).…”
Section: Concentration Of 90 Sr and Absorbed Dosessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, the opinion concerning isolation of radiogenic groups of mice and voles in the Eastern Urals radiocontaminated Reserve is erroneous. Our results are supported by data [18] about significantly lower activity concentrations of 137 Cs and 134 Cs in yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollus Melchior, 1834) than bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus Shreber, 1780) in Belarus after the Chernobyl Accident. It was also established that in the EURT zone absorbed doses, which have been accumulated in molevoles in the course both the pre-reproductive period of life and for the whole life span were significantly higher (up to 30 times) than in mice (table 1).…”
Section: Concentration Of 90 Sr and Absorbed Dosessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The level of radionuclides maintained in an animal's body depends on the transfer ratio (TR, transition coefficient) and the coefficient Ryabokon' et al, 2005 * 187,000 Wild swine (Sus scrofa) Russia Pel'gunov et al, 2006 74,750 Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) Russia Pel'gunov et al, 2006 48,355 Common shrew (Sorex araneus) Russia Ushakov et al, 1996 42,000 Little shrew (Sorex minutus) Russia Ushakov et al, 1996 24,630 Yellow neck mouse Russia Ushakov et al, 1996 (Apodemus flavicollis) 7,500 Brown hare (Lepus europaeus) Russia Pel'gunov et al, 2006 3,320 Moose (Alces alces) Russia Pel'gunov et al, 2006 1,954 White tailed deer Finland Rantavaara, 1987 1,888 Arctic hare (Lepus timidus) Finland Rantavaara et al, 1987 1,610 Moose (Alces alces) Finland Rantavaara et al, 1987 760 1 Moose (Alces alces) Sweden Johanson and Bergström, 1989 720 Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) Finland Rissanen et al, 1987 Cs-134 60,000 Bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) Belarus Ryabokon' et al, 2005 * …”
Section: Incorporation Of Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicator species such as the bank vole (Clethrionomys glareolus) and the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollus) that inhabit the natural forest ecosystems of Belarus showed maximum levels of Cs-134 and Cs-137 for 1 to (Ryabokon' et al, 2005).…”
Section: Cs134/cs-137mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of contamination and dose rate estimates reported [15,16] would be expected to confer considerable insult to genetic material by ionizing radiation. Whether the observed levels of genetic anomalies in plants and animals inhabiting areas affected by Chernobyl accident have any detrimental biological significance to populations is still not known [17].…”
Section: Effects On Non-human Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%