2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term dental and skeletal changes in patients submitted to surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies showed that RPE treatment produced a significant increase in all measured transverse dimensions (10,(23)(24)(25), which was in agreement with our results. All interdental distances (between canines, premolars and molars) in our evaluated sample were significantly wider after therapy, which is in agreement with previous reports (26,27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Earlier studies showed that RPE treatment produced a significant increase in all measured transverse dimensions (10,(23)(24)(25), which was in agreement with our results. All interdental distances (between canines, premolars and molars) in our evaluated sample were significantly wider after therapy, which is in agreement with previous reports (26,27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In case of disagreement regarding which article fulfilled the inclusion criteria, consensus was reached by discussion between the two reviewers. The articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review and were qualitatively analyzed using the Cochrane collaboration recommendations 17 and a modification of the methodological quality scoring scale developed by Vilani et al 18 (Table 2). This modification was proposed to evaluate both the selected randomized and non-randomized controlled studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the patients needed a second surgery to correct the vertical height and further improve the occlusion, thus confirming the general notion that malocclusion often involves multiple diagnoses and additional treatments [15,24]. There is no consensus in the literature regarding the type of distractor (tooth-borne or bone-borne) that should be used for SARME for the provision of optimal expansion and stability [9,[27][28][29]. However, hybrid devices might be a beneficial alternative, wherein the force is applied onto two points (tooth and bone) instead of one (tooth alone), thereby causing a parallel expansion of the palatal vault instead of just tipping the tooth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%