Long-term declines in bird populations in tropical agricultural countryside

Abstract

Tropical agriculture is a major driver of biodiversity loss, yet it can provide conservation opportunities, especially where protected areas are inadequate. To investigate the long-term biodiversity capacity of agricultural countryside, we quantified bird population trends in Costa Rica by mist netting 57,255 birds of 265 species between 1999 and 2010 in sun coffee plantations, riparian corridors, secondary forests, forest fragments, and primary forest reserves. More bird populations (69) were declining than were stable (39) or increasing (4). Declines were common in resident, insectivorous, and more specialized species. There was no relationship between the species richness of a habitat and its conservation value. High-value forest bird communities were characterized by their distinct species composition and habitat and dietary functional signatures. While 49% of bird species preferred forest to coffee, 39% preferred coffee to forest and 12% used both habitats, indicating that coffee plantations have some conservation value. Coffee plantations, although lacking most of the forest specialists, hosted 185 bird species, had the highest capture rates, and supported increasing numbers of some forest species. Coffee plantations with higher tree cover (7% vs. 13%) had more species with increasing capture rates, twice as many forest specialists, and half as many nonforest species. Costa Rican countryside habitats, especially those with greater tree cover, host many bird species and are critical for connecting bird populations in forest remnants. Diversified agricultural landscapes can enhance the biodiversity capacity of tropical countryside, but, for the long-term persistence of all forest bird species, large (>1,000 ha) protected areas are essential. avian ecology | ecosystem services | global change | ornithology | tropical biology

Long‐term change in the avifauna of undisturbed Amazonian rainforest: ground‐foraging birds disappear and the baseline shifts

“…Similarly, landscape effects on ecological function of modern Amazonian bird communities may underestimate function loss since the 1980s (Bregman et al ., 2016). Recovery of secondary forest or certain types of agroforestry can increase diversity of rainforest taxa (Phillips et al ., 2017; Rocha et al ., 2018; Şekercioğlu et al ., 2019), but the magnitude of gains depends upon the baseline for comparison. The pattern we describe unfolded over > 30 years, suggesting that stability over shorter samples (Beaudrot et al ., 2016) may not necessarily imply the absence of a longer‐term trend (Damgaard, 2019).…”

Temperature‐associated decreases in demographic rates of Afrotropical bird species over 30 years

“…We assessed these two hypotheses by regressing estimates of λ from the constant Pradel model ( n = 21) in a linear mixed model against the difference between mean elevation of the study locations (1169 m) and the elevational range midpoint of each species (hereafter “midpoint difference”) as well as against species’ log(body mass). Data for both explanatory variables were taken from a global dataset of bird traits (Şekercioğlu et al, 2019). Both variables were scaled to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.…”

A disconnect between upslope shifts and climate change in an Afrotropical bird community

“…We assessed the role of ecological traits in determining elevational movements across species (Forero‐Medina, Terborgh, et al, 2011; Freeman & Class Freeman, 2014; Freeman, Scholer, et al, 2018) using species‐specific ecological covariates (Table 1) in linear mixed models. These ecological data were taken from BirdBase, a dataset of ecological traits for the world's birds (for a description, see Şekercioğlu et al, 2019). We initially investigated six traits but narrowed them down to three based on collinearity: natural logarithm of mass (log[mass]), habitat breadth (which was positively correlated with elevational range, Pearson's r = .52, and negatively correlated with elevational midpoint, Pearson's r = −.46) and diet breadth (species with narrow diet breadths tended to be insectivores).…”