1997
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.6.2055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term creatine intake is beneficial to muscle performance during resistance training

Abstract: The effects of oral creatine supplementation on muscle phosphocreatine (PCr) concentration, muscle strength, and body composition were investigated in young female volunteers (n = 19) during 10 wk of resistance training (3 h/wk). Compared with placebo, 4 days of high-dose creatine intake (20 g/day) increased (P < 0.05) muscle PCr concentration by 6%. Thereafter, this increase was maintained during 10 wk of training associated with low-dose creatine intake (5 g/day). Compared with placebo, maximal strength of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
279
9
17

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
21
279
9
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies investigated the influence of creatine supplementation on leg muscle performance. [1][2][3][4][5][6]8,9,16,[24][25][26] Since arm muscles contain more type II fibres than leg muscles and since type II fibres have initially a higher phosphocreatine content than type I fibres, 15 it could be hypothesised that creatine supplementation would be less efficient for arm exercise, an assumption that is supported by our findings. However, this hypotesis has to be investigated in further studies, as one cannot conclude definitely if an initially higher phosphocreatine content of arm muscles limits the effectiveness of a creatine supplementation in this muscle group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies investigated the influence of creatine supplementation on leg muscle performance. [1][2][3][4][5][6]8,9,16,[24][25][26] Since arm muscles contain more type II fibres than leg muscles and since type II fibres have initially a higher phosphocreatine content than type I fibres, 15 it could be hypothesised that creatine supplementation would be less efficient for arm exercise, an assumption that is supported by our findings. However, this hypotesis has to be investigated in further studies, as one cannot conclude definitely if an initially higher phosphocreatine content of arm muscles limits the effectiveness of a creatine supplementation in this muscle group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…16,[22][23][24][25][26] Interestingly, in most of the studies showing no ergogenic effect on exercise performance after creatine supplementation, a time or distance trial was performed, [22][23][24][25][26] whereas in studies with a positive effect the time to exhaustion at a given workload was determined. 3,8,9,21 This type of exercise test depends mainly on metabolism and remaining energy stores, whereas during time trials higher movement frequencies are required to improve test results. This is also a neuromuscular problem that not only depends on energy sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From human studies it is known that with a relatively high dosage of creatine (20 grams of creatine monohydrate per day for an adult person of approximately 70 kg, given in intervals of 465 grams) the maximal level of creatine is increased by 10 ± 15% depending on the individual, with the pool being saturated after 7 ± 10 days. 29 Following this loading phase, the maximal pool size can be maintained by a lower maintenance dosage of 2 ± 5 grams per day. It has been shown in rat and other animal species that a creatine supplementation period of 2 ± 4 weeks at the dosage used in this study is necessary and su cient to signi®cantly augment the creatine pool to its maximal size.…”
Section: Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%