A B S T R A C T Variation of Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) test values can have a significant effect on the Engineering Critical Assessment of a structure. This paper examines the development of CTOD with increasing load in an austenitic stainless steel. The silicone replication method giving variation of CTOD across the specimen thickness, and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) are compared to each other, and in turn to clip gauge measurements from tests. Results from Finite Element models are also presented. Estimations of CTOD from BS 7448-1, ISO 12135 and ASTM E1820, and a proposed modification from JWES are compared to the experimental data from the crack cast in silicone compound -assumed to be the actual CTOD. The DIC measurement showed consistency with crack replicas, and a formula is given to estimate CTOD using DIC. For high strain hardening austenitic stainless steel, both the JWES and ASTM E1820 estimations provide adequate accuracy for CTOD.
N O M E N C L A T U R EA p = plastic area under P versus V p a 0 = initial crack length B = specimen thickness B 0 = remaining ligament, W À a 0 b = position on section as a ratio of B / 2 E = modulus of elasticity J = strain energy around the crack K = stress intensity factor K I = stress intensity factor in mode I loading m = plane strain function used in JWES m ASTM = function relating J to CTOD n = strain hardening exponent P = load r p = rotational factor for plastic hinge assumption V g = clip gauge opening displacement V p = plastic component of clip gauge opening displacement W = specimen width z = knife edge height δ = crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) δ 5 = direct CTOD measurement from two points at the specimen surface 5 mm apart, placed directly at the crack tip δ 5 DIC = δ 5 measured using the DIC technique δ SRC = CTOD measured on the silicone replicas δ FE = CTOD obtained from the FE model v = Poisson's ratio σ ys =0.2% proof strength at test temperature σ uts = ultimate tensile strength at test temperature σ y = flow stress at test temperature, (σ ys + σ uts ) / 2 ε = strain ɳ = geometrical based calibration function for J Correspondence: C. J. Brown.