2020
DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2019.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term clinical results of biodegradable vascular scaffold ABSORB BVS™ using the PSP-technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract: This article has been peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance. It is an open access article, which means that it can be downloaded, printed, and distributed freely, provided the work is properly cited. Articles in "Cardiology Journal" are listed in PubMed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[48][49][50][51] Despite no statistically significant difference in terms of study endpoints occur noticeable unfavorable trend in restenosis ratio in DM t.2 subpopulations occurred (8.1% vs 3.3%; p = 0.182). Additionally taking into consideration unfavorable long-term outcomes of first-generation BRS (Absorb) 41,52 future long-term high-number studies are required for a proper evaluation of Magmaris performance in the diabetic population. Even the ratio of target lesion failure achieved by Magmaris BRS in our study cohort was comparable to the second generation of DES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[48][49][50][51] Despite no statistically significant difference in terms of study endpoints occur noticeable unfavorable trend in restenosis ratio in DM t.2 subpopulations occurred (8.1% vs 3.3%; p = 0.182). Additionally taking into consideration unfavorable long-term outcomes of first-generation BRS (Absorb) 41,52 future long-term high-number studies are required for a proper evaluation of Magmaris performance in the diabetic population. Even the ratio of target lesion failure achieved by Magmaris BRS in our study cohort was comparable to the second generation of DES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%