2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40368-019-00423-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, HV‐GIC present better performance and are more appropriate for ART, because they have clinical results comparable with composite resin and amalgam restorations. However, their high viscosity makes the handling of the material more difficult, making it more likely for bubbles to form inside it, which can result in failures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Currently, HV‐GIC present better performance and are more appropriate for ART, because they have clinical results comparable with composite resin and amalgam restorations. However, their high viscosity makes the handling of the material more difficult, making it more likely for bubbles to form inside it, which can result in failures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their high viscosity makes the handling of the material more difficult, making it more likely for bubbles to form inside it, which can result in failures. Different measures including the use of heat or ultrasound have been proposed to optimize the mechanical properties of this material . However, ultrasound and its heat production can cause changes in the tooth structures, requiring more attention and research .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations