1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)39552-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft and the Braunwald-Cutter and Björk-Shiley prostheses in the mitral position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3-5). In general, our hemodynamic results are in agreement with those previously reported by Tandon et al [6,71. However, our results for chronic intravascular hemolysis are different from those reported by those investigators [7]. They reported that patients with the Ionescu-Shiley valve did not show any evidence of hemolysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3-5). In general, our hemodynamic results are in agreement with those previously reported by Tandon et al [6,71. However, our results for chronic intravascular hemolysis are different from those reported by those investigators [7]. They reported that patients with the Ionescu-Shiley valve did not show any evidence of hemolysis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Valve thrombosis has not been encountered in his entire series. The structural integrity of the Ionescu-Shiley xenograft has been maintained, as shown by six years of clinical experience and by more than seven years of in vitro testing [6,7]. No tissue valve failure has been found in our series.…”
Section: Brauiiiald-mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 7-year mean survival rates were reported as 89 ± 9.3%, 81.9 ± 12.8% and 41.7 ± 22.9%, respectively. An elective change of prosthesis was suggested because of the high risk of embolism and death, in contrast to values reported in other studies [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%