2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long term changes in the status of coastal fish in the Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the effect sizes of stickleback predation that we show in this paper are likely conservative since predation may also be present in the coastal habitat (Nilsson, ). Recent investigations have also uncovered a similar negative relationship in abundances between sticklebacks and perch ( Perca fluviatilis ), another coastal top predator that have experienced a similar decline in abundances as in pike (Bergström et al., ). This adds to the generality of our findings and suggests that stickleback predation is an important mechanism for structuring the abundances of coastal top predators, and that it potentially impairs the recovery of weakened populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the effect sizes of stickleback predation that we show in this paper are likely conservative since predation may also be present in the coastal habitat (Nilsson, ). Recent investigations have also uncovered a similar negative relationship in abundances between sticklebacks and perch ( Perca fluviatilis ), another coastal top predator that have experienced a similar decline in abundances as in pike (Bergström et al., ). This adds to the generality of our findings and suggests that stickleback predation is an important mechanism for structuring the abundances of coastal top predators, and that it potentially impairs the recovery of weakened populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Previous research has shown that these populations display homing behaviour (Tibblin, Forsman et al., ), fine‐spatial‐scale genetic population differentiation (Larsson et al., ) and local adaptations to specific streams/wetlands (Berggren et al., ; Sunde, Tamario, Tibblin, Larsson, & Forsman, ; Tibblin, Berggren, Nordahl, Larsson, & Forsman, ; Tibblin et al., ). Moreover, our study area experienced the most extreme decline of pike in the Baltic Sea during the 1990s and abundances are still very low despite that the pike fishery is partially closed and strictly regulated through bag and size limits (Figure b) (Bergström et al., ; Ljunggren et al., ; Nilsson et al., ). Recent studies suggest that adult census population sizes of pike in our study populations vary between approximately 300 and 3,000 adults (Table ; Nilsson et al., ; Larsson et al., ; Tibblin, Forsman et al., ; P. Tibblin, unpubl data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical predatory fish in coastal areas in the Baltic Sea are perch, pikeperch (Sander lucioperca), pike (Esox lucius), cod, turbot (Psetta maxima), and burbot (Lota lota) [20]. As a result of the strong environmental gradients in the Baltic Sea, the species comprising the coastal predatory fish group differs among areas [21,22]. Perch is overall the most common and dominating predatory fish species occurring in most areas, whereas burbot are confined to more northern and less saline areas and cod and turbot to the south-western and more saline areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have addressed the past status (data until 2013) of predatory fish as a functional group [21], potential causes for change of perch populations and predatory fish as a functional group [25,28], and population structures for coastal fish in the Baltic Sea [26]. This review is novel in several aspects including, for example, the most recent status assessment of predatory fish (data until 2016/2017), the first Baltic wide assessment of the population trends for pike and pikeperch, as well as a review of the causes for population change in coastal predatory fish and possible measures for restoring and supporting coastal predatory fish populations and stocks in the Baltic Sea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%