1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0088(199902)19:2<211::aid-joc351>3.0.co;2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term changes in net radiation and its components above a pine forest and a grass surface in Germany

Abstract: Long‐term measurements (1974–1993 and 1996, respectively) of the net radiation (Q), global radiation (G), reflected global radiation (R), long‐wave atmospheric radiation (A) and thermal radiation (E) of a pine forest in Southern Germany (index p) and of a grass surface in Northern Germany (index g) are compared. The influence of changes in surface properties is discussed. There are, in the case of the pine stand, forest growth and forest management and in the case of the grass surface, the shifting of the site… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence caused by the radiative fluxes could be quantified. The differences in K# p between both slopes found in this study were comparable to the differences Kessler and Jaeger (1999) found between two sites in northern and southern Germany about 600 km apart. Thus it appears that the orientation of the slopes has a large influence on the microclimate and hence the growing conditions of the forest vegetation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The influence caused by the radiative fluxes could be quantified. The differences in K# p between both slopes found in this study were comparable to the differences Kessler and Jaeger (1999) found between two sites in northern and southern Germany about 600 km apart. Thus it appears that the orientation of the slopes has a large influence on the microclimate and hence the growing conditions of the forest vegetation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Since the weather conditions were almost equal at both sites, different optical features of both land-use types must have been the main cause of this difference. The more pronounced surface structure of the Scots pine at the adjacent Bremgarten weather station forest led to stronger multiple reflection and scattering of the downward short-wave radiation than at the grassland site (Wicke & Bernhofer 1996, Kessler & Jaeger 1999. As a consequence of its lower albedo, the Scots pine forest had a corresponding higher net short-wave radiation than the grassland site (Rost 2004).…”
Section: Radiative Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wicke & Bernhofer (1996) analysed the energetic behaviour of the 2 sites in southwest Germany that are investigated in this study, but only on the basis of an intensive 2 wk measurement campaign characterised by clear-sky weather. Kessler & Jaeger (1999) compared the radiative fluxes between the forest site of this study and a grassland site near Hamburg (in northern Germany). However, sites which are far away from each other are influenced by different synoptic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most countries measured R n is available only from well equipped weather stations at research sites, as net radiometers are delicate instruments that require regular maintenance and calibration. Therefore, R n measurements of high temporal and spatial resolution are scarce (Dong et al 1992;Allen 1996;Llasat and Snyder 1998;Kessler and Jaeger 1999;Alados et al 2003). Hence, in lieu of measured R n , calculated values of R n are commonly used (Doorenbos and Pruitt 1977;FAO 1990;Allen et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%