Long‐Term Assessment (5 to 71 Months) of Endosseous Dental Implants Placed in the Augmented Maxillary Sinus

Jw, Olson; Cd, Dent; Hf, Morris; Ochi, Shigeru

doi:10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.152

Cited by 90 publications

(63 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As such, maxillary sinus bone graft was suggested as an alternative method 5,6 . Implantation combined with maxillary sinus bone graft has been used widely as a predictable method with high survival rate, and it is useful in overcoming the limit of restoration of the maxillary posterior area with insufficient residual alveolar bone [7][8][9][10] . Performing maxillary sinus bone graft requires understanding the anatomy of maxillary sinus first.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on the position of the posterior superior alveolar artery in relation to the performance of the maxillary sinus bone graft procedure in a Korean population

Park

Choi

Kim

2012

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;38:71-7) Objectives: This study sought to investigate the positioning of the posterior superior alveolar artery in relation to the performance of the maxillary sinus bone graft procedure in a Korean population. Materials and Methods: We identified the position of the posterior superior alveolar artery relative to 93 maxillary sinuses in 58 patients and determined the distance from the inferior border of the artery in the premolar and molar areas to the alveolar ridge and sinus floor. Results: The mean distance from the alveolar ridge to the posterior superior alveolar artery in the dentate group (20.62±3.05 mm in the premolar region, 17.50±2.84 mm in the molar region) was greater than as compared to the edentulous group (18.83±2.79 mm in the premolar region, 15.50±1.64 mm in the molar region), and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference (P >0.05) between the mean distance from the sinus floor to the posterior superior alveolar artery in the dentate group (8.21±2.79 mm in the premolar region, 7.52±2.07 mm in the molar region) or in the edentulous group (7.75±3.31 mm in the premolar region, 7.97±2.31 mm in the molar region). Conclusion: Prior to surgery, it is important to evaluate the position of the posterior superior maxillary artery by using computed tomography scans. The premolar area is safer than the molar area for performing the maxillary sinus bone graft without bleeding.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on the position of the posterior superior alveolar artery in relation to the performance of the maxillary sinus bone graft procedure in a Korean population

Park

Choi

Kim

2012

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[17] On the contrary, according to other studies and various systematic reviews, survival rates for implants partially inserted in grafted maxillary sinuses are similar or even superior to those associated with implants placed in native maxillary areas. [8,9,20,21] A total survival rate of 99% for implants inserted with the ISFE approach after 6 months and 94% after 42À56 months was reported in another study. [30] A review study of the ISFE approach [42] are widely used for the assessment of the success of dental implants, including the one that vertical bone loss should be less than 0.2 mm annually following the first year of function of an implant.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 91%

Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla

Tomruk

Şençift

Duygu

2015

Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of sinus-lifting procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla. This retrospective chart review examined consecutive patients with tooth/teeth loss in the posterior maxilla between 2008 and 2012 treated with sinus lift, when needed, and implant insertion. Demographic variables, health status, residual alveolar bone height, augmentation types, the implant position, diameter and height, and implant failure, prosthesis types, and the marginal bone loss were recorded. The study included 302 patients at a mean age of 5.2 years, who received a total of 609 dental implants. A total of 380 (62.3%) implants were inserted in native areas, 203 (33.3%) ones in external sinus-lifted areas and 26 (4.4%) ones in internal lifted areas. The survival rate in native or internal lifted areas were 100% and 95.6% in external sinus lifted ones (10 implant failures/203 implants). Almost half of the implants were examined radiologically with a mean duration of 30 months and the mean marginal bone loss was 0.64 § 1.2 mm. The results showed that the survival rates of native bone and the internal sinus lifting were slightly higher than that of external sinus lifting. Implants placed with sinus augmentation exhibited more marginal bone loss than implants in native bone.

show abstract

“…Material exposure after surgery can lead to bacterial growth, alteration of fibroblast morphology, and migration, all of which may jeopard ize the success of the regeneration process. Another common problem is the difficulty in preventing membrane collapse into the defect, which can result in inadequate space making [16].…”

Section: Resorbable Materials and Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

JDHODT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Long‐Term Assessment (5 to 71 Months) of Endosseous Dental Implants Placed in the Augmented Maxillary Sinus

Abstract: These findings support the use of implants placed in augmented sinuses to support dental prostheses.

Cited by 90 publications

References 9 publications

Study on the position of the posterior superior alveolar artery in relation to the performance of the maxillary sinus bone graft procedure in a Korean population

Study on the position of the posterior superior alveolar artery in relation to the performance of the maxillary sinus bone graft procedure in a Korean population

Prevalence of sinus floor elevation procedures and survival rates of implants placed in the posterior maxilla

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About