Abstract:Rationale: Risk factors for COVID-19 mortality may include environmental exposures, such as air pollution.Objectives: Determine whether, amongst adults hospitalized with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, long-term air pollution exposure is associated with risk for mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission or intubation.
Methods:We performed a retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients admitted to seven New York City hospitals from March 8, 2020 to August 30, 2020. The primary outcome was mortality; … Show more
“…Previous ecological studies found positive associations between long-term exposure to PM 2.5 , NO 2 and O 3 , and COVID-19 mortality and case fatality rate. 29 , 38 , 39 In other, more limited, cohort studies, Bowe and colleagues found a relative risk of 1.09 (95% CI 1.07–1.11) per 1.70 μg/m 3 increase in PM 2.5 concentration for hospital admission among American veterans who received a diagnosis of COVID-19, 16 while Bozack and colleagues 15 found relative risks of 1.23 (95% CI 1.00–1.53) for ICU admission and 1.20 (95% CI 1.03–1.39) for death, but no association with NO 2 among people admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Using slightly different methods, a cohort study in Spain and a cohort study in the Mexico City metropolitan area also found a positive association between PM 2.5 and COVID-19 severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, a cohort study with data on individuals with SARS-CoV-2 is a more appropriate design. 6 , 14 Studies that have used individual data were conducted in specific subpopulations 15 , 16 or populations with few severe cases, 17 or had limited data on individual exposure to air pollutants. 18 In Canada, 1 ecological study found a positive association between long-term exposure to PM 2.5 and COVID-19 incidence, 19 but no published study has explored the association between air pollution and COVID-19 severity.…”
Background:
The tremendous global health burden related to COVID-19 means that identifying determinants of COVID-19 severity is important for prevention and intervention. We aimed to explore long-term exposure to ambient air pollution as a potential contributor to COVID-19 severity, given its known impact on the respiratory system.
Methods:
We used a cohort of all people with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, aged 20 years and older and not residing in a long-term care facility in Ontario, Canada, during 2020. We evaluated the association between long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM
2.5
), nitrogen dioxide (NO
2
) and ground-level ozone (O
3
), and risk of COVID-19-related hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. We ascertained individuals’ long-term exposures to each air pollutant based on their residence from 2015 to 2019. We used logistic regression and adjusted for confounders and selection bias using various individual and contextual covariates obtained through data linkage.
Results:
Among the 151 105 people with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in Ontario in 2020, we observed 8630 hospital admissions, 1912 ICU admissions and 2137 deaths related to COVID-19. For each interquartile range increase in exposure to PM
2.5
(1.70 μg/m
3
), we estimated odds ratios of 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.12), 1.09 (95% CI 0.98–1.21) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.90–1.11) for hospital admission, ICU admission and death, respectively. Estimates were smaller for NO
2
. We also estimated odds ratios of 1.15 (95% CI 1.06–1.23), 1.30 (95% CI 1.12–1.50) and 1.18 (95% CI 1.02–1.36) per interquartile range increase of 5.14 ppb in O
3
for hospital admission, ICU admission and death, respectively.
Interpretation:
Chronic exposure to air pollution may contribute to severe outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly exposure to O
3
.
“…Previous ecological studies found positive associations between long-term exposure to PM 2.5 , NO 2 and O 3 , and COVID-19 mortality and case fatality rate. 29 , 38 , 39 In other, more limited, cohort studies, Bowe and colleagues found a relative risk of 1.09 (95% CI 1.07–1.11) per 1.70 μg/m 3 increase in PM 2.5 concentration for hospital admission among American veterans who received a diagnosis of COVID-19, 16 while Bozack and colleagues 15 found relative risks of 1.23 (95% CI 1.00–1.53) for ICU admission and 1.20 (95% CI 1.03–1.39) for death, but no association with NO 2 among people admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Using slightly different methods, a cohort study in Spain and a cohort study in the Mexico City metropolitan area also found a positive association between PM 2.5 and COVID-19 severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, a cohort study with data on individuals with SARS-CoV-2 is a more appropriate design. 6 , 14 Studies that have used individual data were conducted in specific subpopulations 15 , 16 or populations with few severe cases, 17 or had limited data on individual exposure to air pollutants. 18 In Canada, 1 ecological study found a positive association between long-term exposure to PM 2.5 and COVID-19 incidence, 19 but no published study has explored the association between air pollution and COVID-19 severity.…”
Background:
The tremendous global health burden related to COVID-19 means that identifying determinants of COVID-19 severity is important for prevention and intervention. We aimed to explore long-term exposure to ambient air pollution as a potential contributor to COVID-19 severity, given its known impact on the respiratory system.
Methods:
We used a cohort of all people with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, aged 20 years and older and not residing in a long-term care facility in Ontario, Canada, during 2020. We evaluated the association between long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM
2.5
), nitrogen dioxide (NO
2
) and ground-level ozone (O
3
), and risk of COVID-19-related hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death. We ascertained individuals’ long-term exposures to each air pollutant based on their residence from 2015 to 2019. We used logistic regression and adjusted for confounders and selection bias using various individual and contextual covariates obtained through data linkage.
Results:
Among the 151 105 people with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in Ontario in 2020, we observed 8630 hospital admissions, 1912 ICU admissions and 2137 deaths related to COVID-19. For each interquartile range increase in exposure to PM
2.5
(1.70 μg/m
3
), we estimated odds ratios of 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.12), 1.09 (95% CI 0.98–1.21) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.90–1.11) for hospital admission, ICU admission and death, respectively. Estimates were smaller for NO
2
. We also estimated odds ratios of 1.15 (95% CI 1.06–1.23), 1.30 (95% CI 1.12–1.50) and 1.18 (95% CI 1.02–1.36) per interquartile range increase of 5.14 ppb in O
3
for hospital admission, ICU admission and death, respectively.
Interpretation:
Chronic exposure to air pollution may contribute to severe outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly exposure to O
3
.
“…In addition, some individual-level studies used spatially inaccurate or area-level estimates of long-term air pollution exposure ( Bowe et al, 2021 ; López-Feldman et al, 2021 ; Marquès et al, 2022 ; Mendy et al, 2021 ; Travaglio et al, 2021 ), which may have resulted in exposure misclassification. Furthermore, some individual-level studies included only hospitalised patients in retrospective study designs ( Bozack et al, 2022 ; Marquès et al, 2022 ; Mendy et al, 2021 ), which limits causal interpretation and generalisability.…”
“…One of the main consequences of the changes in air quality is to be sought on the health of populations. Although epidemiological studies have highlighted the relationship between mortality records or hospital admissions and changes in air quality during COVID-19 restrictions ( Bozack et al, 2021 ; Hameed et al, 2021 ; Naqvi et al, 2021 ), little work has been done on the health impacts resulting from these changes in air pollutant levels compared to the number of studies on air quality during lockdowns. Table 1 summarizes the result of the comprehensive literature review on health risks related to changes in air pollution during lockdowns.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.