2016
DOI: 10.3390/f7100231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term (13 Years) Decomposition Rates of Forest Floor Organic Matter on Paired Coniferous and Deciduous Watersheds with Contrasting Temperature Regimes

Abstract: Two sets of paired watersheds on north and South facing slopes were utilized to simulate the effects of temperature differences that are on the scale of those expected with near-term climatic warming on decomposition. Two watersheds were pine plantations (Pinus strobus L.) and two were mature deciduous forests established at similar elevation ranges and precipitation at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, but they differed in slope aspect (north vs. South facing), solar radiation, and litter temperature by abou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers have reported that the facing slope affects the decomposition rate, being faster on the northern slope than on the southern slope (Sariyildiz and Kucuk 2008;Jasińska et al 2019). On the other hand, some researchers have reported a faster decomposition of litterfall on the southern aspects than on the northern (Mudrick et al 1994;Qualls 2016), which is in line with our results. Furthermore, in open-canopied mature stands, the decomposition rate was found to be faster on the southern slopes in comparison to the north in contrast to the case of the dense canopy, likely due to age-and light-related changes in litterfall composition or balance between temperature and moisture on the forest floor.…”
Section: Litter Decompositionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Many researchers have reported that the facing slope affects the decomposition rate, being faster on the northern slope than on the southern slope (Sariyildiz and Kucuk 2008;Jasińska et al 2019). On the other hand, some researchers have reported a faster decomposition of litterfall on the southern aspects than on the northern (Mudrick et al 1994;Qualls 2016), which is in line with our results. Furthermore, in open-canopied mature stands, the decomposition rate was found to be faster on the southern slopes in comparison to the north in contrast to the case of the dense canopy, likely due to age-and light-related changes in litterfall composition or balance between temperature and moisture on the forest floor.…”
Section: Litter Decompositionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Finn et al [44] reported that the amounts of soil C and N pools that remained in coniferous forest floors after decomposition at a constant temperature were larger than those in deciduous forest floors. In particular, even under similar environmental conditions (climate region, temperature, rainfall, and soil moisture), it is well-known that soil CO 2 efflux is highest from deciduous forests, followed by mixed forests, and lowest from coniferous forests [44][45][46], as a result of the higher lignin content of their leaf-litter [47,48] and lower SOM degradation [46]. Compared with the control soils, N deposition obviously increased soil total C contents (p < 0.001) ( Figure 6), and this increase in SOC pools was well supported by the increase in 15 N recovery ( Figure 5) and the concurrent decrease in soil-δ 13 C to 0-10 cm soil depth in both forest soils ( Figure 6).…”
Section: Effect Of N Treatment On Soil Total C Contents and δ 13 C Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related area of uncertainty is how the type of plant-derived carbon enhances microbial SOC storage or alternatively accelerates SOC decomposition (12). For example, leaf litter and needle litter serve as sources of carbon for microbial growth in forest soils, but litter chemistry and pH varies by vegetation type [e.g., between root and foliar litter (13) or between deciduous and coniferous forest litter (14)]. In turn, these biochemical differences influence SOC levels through changing decomposition dynamics (14).…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, leaf litter and needle litter serve as sources of carbon for microbial growth in forest soils, but litter chemistry and pH varies by vegetation type [e.g., between root and foliar litter (13) or between deciduous and coniferous forest litter (14)]. In turn, these biochemical differences influence SOC levels through changing decomposition dynamics (14). Also, increased diversity of plant communities increases rates of rhizodeposition, stimulating microbial activity and SOC storage (15), although soils eventually reach a saturation point beyond which they cannot store additional carbon (16).…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%