2020
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐read sequencing and de novo assembly of the Luffa cylindrica (L.) Roem. genome

Abstract: Sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrica (L.) Roem.) or luffa is a diploid herbaceous plant with 26 chromosomes (2n = 26) and belongs to the family Cucurbitaceae. To address the limited knowledge of the genome of Luffa species, the chromosome‐level genome of L. cylindrica was assembled and analysed using PacBio long reads and Hi‐C data. We combined Hi‐C data with a draft genome assembly to generate chromosome‐length scaffolds. Thirteen scaffolds corresponding to the 13 chromosomes were assembled from 1,156 contigs to a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numbers of protein‐coding genes in L. acutangula and L. cylindrica obtained for our assemblies were similar to the figure previously reported for L. cylindrica genome (Zhang et al., 2020), while the proportions of repetitive sequences identified in our genome assemblies (62% for L. acutangula and 57% for L. cylindrica ) were slightly lower than the percentage reported for L. cylindrica (73%) in Zhang et al. (2020). The availability of this assembly enabled comparative genomics/phylogenetic studies of the Cucurbitaceae family members.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The numbers of protein‐coding genes in L. acutangula and L. cylindrica obtained for our assemblies were similar to the figure previously reported for L. cylindrica genome (Zhang et al., 2020), while the proportions of repetitive sequences identified in our genome assemblies (62% for L. acutangula and 57% for L. cylindrica ) were slightly lower than the percentage reported for L. cylindrica (73%) in Zhang et al. (2020). The availability of this assembly enabled comparative genomics/phylogenetic studies of the Cucurbitaceae family members.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…De novo assemblies of PacBio sequences from L. acutangula and L. cylindrica yielded draft genomes of 734.6 Mb and 689.8 Mb in 2,280 and 3,570 scaffolds with scaffold N50 of 786,130 (L50 = 220 scaffolds) and 578,616 bases (L50 = 316 scaffolds), respectively (Table 1). Analyses of k ‐mer distribution of the genome sequencing reads provided estimated genome sizes of 760 Mb and 773 Mb for L. acutangula and L. cylindrica , respectively, close to the figure previously reported for L. cylindrica (An et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020) (Figure S1). The heterozygosity of L. acutangula and L. cylindrica was 0.41 and 0.25, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genomic tools have improved the breeding efficiency of major cucurbit crops, and transgenic and genome-edited plants have been produced [47,48]. The availability of whole genome sequences of C. moschata [49], M. charantia [50], and L. cylindrica [51] is stimulating molecular breeding approaches in these crops. Several markers putatively associated with resistance to ZYMV in pumpkin and CPM in bitter gourd have been proposed and are being validated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to previously available genome assemblies for this species, the Scaffold N50 value was improved 163 fold (contig N50 size of J. cathayensis v2.0 was 23,789,296 bp versus 145,095 bp contig N50 size for J. cathayensis v1.0), and the final calculated genome size is smaller (580Mb, v1.0 versus 548Mb, v2.0) (Figure1; Table S12). Through Hi-C, a chromosome-level genome was obtained with a scaffold size of 36Mb (Table S12) and scaffolds resolved into 16 chromosomes, unlike the previously available genome (J. cathayensis v1.0; Stevens et al, 2018) (Table S5, Table S12) (DeMaere & Darling, 2019;Zhang et al, 2020c;Chen et al, 2020;Choi et al, 2020). We predicted 29,032 protein-coding genes from the generated assembly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%