2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1500-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-read based de novo assembly of low-complexity metagenome samples results in finished genomes and reveals insights into strain diversity and an active phage system

Abstract: Background Complete and contiguous genome assemblies greatly improve the quality of subsequent systems-wide functional profiling studies and the ability to gain novel biological insights. While a de novo genome assembly of an isolated bacterial strain is in most cases straightforward, more informative data about co-existing bacteria as well as synergistic and antagonistic effects can be obtained from a direct analysis of microbial communities. However, the complexity of metagenomic samples represe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
96
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a 2 x 300 bp paired end library (Illumina Nextera XT DNA kit) was sequenced on a MiSeq. Polishing of the assembly with Illumina reads, circularization, start alignment using dnaA and final verification of assembly completeness were performed as described previously [64]. The quality of the aligned reads and the final chromosome was assessed using Qualimap [65].…”
Section: Sequencing De Novo Genome Assembly and Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a 2 x 300 bp paired end library (Illumina Nextera XT DNA kit) was sequenced on a MiSeq. Polishing of the assembly with Illumina reads, circularization, start alignment using dnaA and final verification of assembly completeness were performed as described previously [64]. The quality of the aligned reads and the final chromosome was assessed using Qualimap [65].…”
Section: Sequencing De Novo Genome Assembly and Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches were successfully applied on prokaryotes (Sedlar et al, 2016;Parks et al, 2017;Stewart et al, 2019) but the main limit of the alignment-based approach still relies on the availability, completeness and quality of reference genomes that can be constructed from metagenomic data (Parks et al, 2017). The approach took recently advantages of long-read sequencing (Huson et al, 2018;Somerville et al, 2019). However, due to the large genome size of eukaryotes and the difficulties to obtain high molecular weight DNA, yet, such approaches did not produce results on eukaryotes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several long-read assembly methods have been successfully used for single-genome de novo assembly Koren et al, 2017) and new promising tools are being developed for metagenomic assembly (Kolmogorov et al, 2019a), how well these methods perform with real metagenomic data still remains to be properly evaluated. Yet, an increasing number of long read-based metagenomics studies demonstrate that it is possible to reconstruct complete or near-complete genomes from mock communities and natural microbial communities of varying complexity (Bertrand et al, 2019;Hao et al, 2018;Moss and Bhatt, 2018;Nicholls et al, 2019;Somerville et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In metagenomes, repetitive sequences can be present within a single genome, as well as within several genomes that share similar regions (e.g., closely related strains, horizontally transferred genes). Therefore, if reads are long enough to span across repetitive regions, and also cover regions that are unique to a particular genome, their inclusion in metagenome assemblies can help to separate the genomic sequences of different organisms, reducing the number of chimeric contigs (Somerville et al, 2019). Furthermore, provided enough sequencing depth, metagenomic assemblies of long-read sequence datasets are expected to generate longer contigs than short-read-based assemblies, reducing potential risks of misclassifying contigs in metagenome binning efforts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%