1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80232-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long QT: Good, bad or indifferent?

Abstract: A survey of current literature suggests an increasing interest in both the desirable and undesirable implications of a prolonged QT interval, the former perceived to be the beneficial effect of antiarrhythmic drugs that prolong the duration of ventricular action potential, and the latter considered to be a potential marker for sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic heart disease. In addition, there has been an increasing interest in the congenital long QT syndrome associated with an apparent dysfunctio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
1
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Max=maximum, Min=minimum, QTc=corrected QT, OTd=OT dispersion, OTcd=corrected OT dispersion arrhythmia [9,10]. Elongation of the repolarization time increases the risk of arrhythmia but not always cause ventricular arrhythmias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Max=maximum, Min=minimum, QTc=corrected QT, OTd=OT dispersion, OTcd=corrected OT dispersion arrhythmia [9,10]. Elongation of the repolarization time increases the risk of arrhythmia but not always cause ventricular arrhythmias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that this study did not have the appropriate design to establish these correlations for the following reasons: QTc max is known to vary between and within individuals, and the QTc dispersion (i.e. the distribution of repolarization on the heart) rather than the absolute value of QTc max may be considered as a risk factor for the occurrence of arrhythmias (Surawicz and Knoebel, 1984). Moreover, in our study patients were not randomized for the different S9788 dose levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be explained by the abovementioned reasons, and/or by the fact that other doses and schedules of S9788 were used. Although a predictive value of QTc lengthening for the occurrence of severe arrhythmias has never been established for values < 600 ms (Surawicz and Knoebel, 1984), the study was terminated after the occurrence of severe cardiac arrhythmias (torsade de pointe with syncope) in another ongoing study with S9788 given over 6 h (Terret et al, 1996). Such a risk would preclude the routine use of S9788.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three functions (CQT, NDIFF, and PROD) are shown in figure 4-4. The function CQT was based on the clinical finding that in most people, the length of the QT interval (beginning of QRS complex to the end of the T-wave) is proportional to the inverse square root of the preceding RR interval (Surawicz 1984). Therefore, dividing RR 1 by sqrt(RR 2 ) provided a measure of where the beat B 1 fell with respect to the normalized QT interval of B 2 .…”
Section: ________________________________________ ___________________mentioning
confidence: 99%