2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15112-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long noncoding RNA AGPG regulates PFKFB3-mediated tumor glycolytic reprogramming

Abstract: Tumor cells often reprogram their metabolism for rapid proliferation. The roles of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in metabolism remodeling and the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Through screening, we found that the lncRNA Actin Gamma 1 Pseudogene (AGPG) is required for increased glycolysis activity and cell proliferation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Mechanistically, AGPG binds to and stabilizes 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3). By preventing APC/C-mediated u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 Our recent studies have investigated the roles of metabolic microenvironment reprogramming in promoting gastrointestinal cancer progression. [10][11][12][13] However, the effects of acidic stress on cancer and the underlying mechanisms need further study. Thus, we sought to investigate the effects of the acidic tumor microenvironment on CRC stem cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Our recent studies have investigated the roles of metabolic microenvironment reprogramming in promoting gastrointestinal cancer progression. [10][11][12][13] However, the effects of acidic stress on cancer and the underlying mechanisms need further study. Thus, we sought to investigate the effects of the acidic tumor microenvironment on CRC stem cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASOs used in vivo with the same sequences were chemically modified by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). The modifications were described previously 20 , 21 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IHC staining was performed as previously described. 51,52 The slides from pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies were de-waxed and rehydrated. The antigens were retrieved, and the slides were permeabilised and blocked before hybridisation with mouse anti-CD4 antibody (Cat# ZM-0418; ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China), rabbit anti-CD8 antibody (Cat# ZA-0508; ZSGB-Bio), mouse anti-CD68 antibody (Cat# ab201340; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), mouse anti-PD-L1/CD274 antibody (Cat# 66248-1-Ig; ProteinTech, Chicago, IL, USA), rabbit anti-RBPJL antibody (Cat# LS-C162508; LS Bio, Seattle, WA, USA), rabbit anti-IL-16 antibody (Cat# DF6600; Affinity Biosciences, Cincinnati, OH, USA), mouse anti-Ki-67 antibody (Cat# 9449; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), rabbit anti-CD4 antibody (Cat# 25229; Cell Signaling Technology) and rabbit anti-CD8 antibody (Cat# 98941; Cell Signaling Technology) at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit/mouse immunoglobulin (GK500705, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) at 37°C for 30 min.…”
Section: Ihc Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%